Where Does Trust Break Down? A Quantitative Trust Analysis of Deep Neural Networks via Trust Matrix and Conditional Trust Densities
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The advances and successes in deep learning in recent years have led to considerable efforts and investments into its widespread ubiquitous adoption for a wide variety of applications, ranging from personal assistants and intelligent navigation to search and product recommendation in e-commerce. With this tremendous rise in deep learning adoption comes questions about the trustworthiness of the deep neural networks that power these applications. Motivated to answer such questions, there has been a very recent interest in trust quantification. In this work, we introduce the concept of trust matrix, a novel trust quantification strategy that leverages the recently introduced question-answer trust metric by Wong et al. to provide deeper, more detailed insights into where trust breaks down for a given deep neural network given a set of questions. More specifically, a trust matrix defines the expected question-answer trust for a given actor-oracle answer scenario, allowing one to quickly spot areas of low trust that needs to be addressed to improve the trustworthiness of a deep neural network. The proposed trust matrix is simple to calculate, humanly interpretable, and to the best of the authors' knowledge is the first to study trust at the actor-oracle answer level. We further extend the concept of trust densities with the notion of conditional trust densities. We experimentally leverage trust matrices to study several well-known deep neural network architectures for image recognition, and further study the trust density and conditional trust densities for an interesting actor-oracle answer scenario. The results illustrate that trust matrices, along with conditional trust densities, can be useful tools in addition to the existing suite of trust quantification metrics for guiding practitioners and regulators in creating and certifying deep learning solutions for trusted operation.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 30 Sep 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 3; 2025: 1.
7 papers.
- 2022Video-based Formative and Summative Assessment of Surgical Tasks using Deep Learningcited by 8
- 2024Taking Training Seriously: Human Guidance and Management-Based Regulation of Artificial Intelligencecited by 3
- 2021COVID-Net Clinical ICU: Enhanced Prediction of ICU Admission for COVID-19 Patients via Explainability and Trust Quantificationcited by 2
- 2022SolderNet: Towards Trustworthy Visual Inspection of Solder Joints in Electronics Manufacturing Using Explainable Artificial Intelligencecited by 2
- 2024Cognitive-Motor Integration in Assessing Bimanual Motor Skillscited by 0
- 2024Deep Learning for Video-Based Assessment of Endotracheal Intubation Skillscited by 0
- 2025Airway Skill Assessment with Spatiotemporal Attention Mechanisms Using Human Gazecited by 0
- 2025Airway Skill Assessment with Spatiotemporal Attention Mechanisms Using Human Gaze24 Jun 2025
- 2024Deep Learning for Video-Based Assessment of Endotracheal Intubation Skills17 Apr 2024
- 2024Cognitive-Motor Integration in Assessing Bimanual Motor Skills16 Apr 2024
- 2024Taking Training Seriously: Human Guidance and Management-Based Regulation of Artificial Intelligence13 Feb 2024
- 2022SolderNet: Towards Trustworthy Visual Inspection of Solder Joints in Electronics Manufacturing Using Explainable Artificial Intelligence18 Nov 2022
- 2022Video-based Formative and Summative Assessment of Surgical Tasks using Deep Learning17 Mar 2022
- 2021COVID-Net Clinical ICU: Enhanced Prediction of ICU Admission for COVID-19 Patients via Explainability and Trust Quantification14 Sep 2021