mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Learn to Tour: Operator Design For Solution Feasibility Mapping in Pickup-and-delivery Traveling Salesman Problem

arXiv 2404.11458 ↗First posted 17 Apr 2024cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper aims to develop a learning method for a special class of traveling salesman problems (TSP), namely, the pickup-and-delivery TSP (PDTSP), which finds the shortest tour along a sequence of one-to-one pickup-and-delivery nodes. One-to-one here means that the transported people or goods are associated with designated pairs of pickup and delivery nodes, in contrast to that indistinguishable goods can be delivered to any nodes. In PDTSP, precedence constraints need to be satisfied that each pickup node must be visited before its corresponding delivery node. Classic operations research (OR) algorithms for PDTSP are difficult to scale to large-sized problems. Recently, reinforcement learning (RL) has been applied to TSPs. The basic idea is to explore and evaluate visiting sequences in a solution space. However, this approach could be less computationally efficient, as it has to potentially evaluate many infeasible solutions of which precedence constraints are violated. To restrict solution search within a feasible space, we utilize operators that always map one feasible solution to another, without spending time exploring the infeasible solution space. Such operators are evaluated and selected as policies to solve PDTSPs in an RL framework. We make a comparison of our method and baselines, including classic OR algorithms and existing learning methods. Results show that our approach can find tours shorter than baselines.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Apr 2024.

Builds on

18 of 44 references.

References · 18

  1. 2015Pointer Networkscited by 882
  2. 2018Attention, Learn to Solve Routing Problems!cited by 646
  3. 2016Neural Combinatorial Optimization with Reinforcement Learningcited by 600
  4. 2019An Efficient Graph Convolutional Network Technique for the Travelling Salesman Problemcited by 265
  5. 2018Learning to Perform Local Rewriting for Combinatorial Optimizationcited by 183
  6. 2019Learning Improvement Heuristics for Solving Routing Problemscited by 162
  7. 2021NeuroLKH: Combining Deep Learning Model with Lin-Kernighan-Helsgaun Heuristic for Solving the Traveling Salesman Problemcited by 102
  8. 2020Learning 2-opt Heuristics for the Traveling Salesman Problem via Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 100
  9. 2019Exploratory Combinatorial Optimization with Reinforcement Learningcited by 82
  10. 2021Heterogeneous Attentions for Solving Pickup and Delivery Problem via Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 35
  11. 2020Combining Reinforcement Learning with Lin-Kernighan-Helsgaun Algorithm for the Traveling Salesman Problemcited by 31
  12. 2022Efficient Neural Neighborhood Search for Pickup and Delivery Problemscited by 29
6 more
  1. 2021Learning to Optimize Industry-Scale Dynamic Pickup and Delivery Problemscited by 15
  2. 2022Reinforced Lin-Kernighan-Helsgaun Algorithms for the Traveling Salesman Problemscited by 12
  3. 2020Solve Traveling Salesman Problem by Monte Carlo Tree Search and Deep Neural Networkcited by 7
  4. 2021Exponential-Size Neighborhoods for the Pickup-and-Delivery Traveling Salesman Problemcited by 3
  5. 2022A Branch-and-Price Algorithm for the Electric Autonomous Dial-A-Ride Problemcited by 2
  6. 2022Dial-a-ride problem with modular platooning and en-route transferscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.