CARE to Compare: A real-world dataset for anomaly detection in wind turbine data
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Anomaly detection plays a crucial role in the field of predictive maintenance for wind turbines, yet the comparison of different algorithms poses a difficult task because domain specific public datasets are scarce. Many comparisons of different approaches either use benchmarks composed of data from many different domains, inaccessible data or one of the few publicly available datasets which lack detailed information about the faults. Moreover, many publications highlight a couple of case studies where fault detection was successful. With this paper we publish a high quality dataset that contains data from 36 wind turbines across 3 different wind farms as well as the most detailed fault information of any public wind turbine dataset as far as we know. The new dataset contains 89 years worth of real-world operating data of wind turbines, distributed across 44 labeled time frames for anomalies that led up to faults, as well as 51 time series representing normal behavior. Additionally, the quality of training data is ensured by turbine-status-based labels for each data point. Furthermore, we propose a new scoring method, called CARE (Coverage, Accuracy, Reliability and Earliness), which takes advantage of the information depth that is present in the dataset to identify a good all-around anomaly detection model. This score considers the anomaly detection performance, the ability to recognize normal behavior properly and the capability to raise as few false alarms as possible while simultaneously detecting anomalies early.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Apr 2024.
Builds on
9 of 39 references.
References · 9
- 2019Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Frameworkcited by 2,455
- 2020A Unifying Review of Deep and Shallow Anomaly Detectioncited by 423
- 2022ADBench: Anomaly Detection Benchmarkcited by 230
- 2020Deep Learning for Anomaly Detection: A Reviewcited by 159
- 2020Current Time Series Anomaly Detection Benchmarks are Flawed and are Creating the Illusion of Progresscited by 148
- 2015Evaluating Real-time Anomaly Detection Algorithms - the Numenta Anomaly Benchmarkcited by 87
- 2021An Evaluation of Anomaly Detection and Diagnosis in Multivariate Time Seriescited by 68
- 2021Anomaly Detection in Predictive Maintenance: A New Evaluation Framework for Temporal Unsupervised Anomaly Detection Algorithmscited by 5
- 2022A Collection and Categorization of Open-Source Wind and Wind Power Datasetscited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.