mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Node Similarities under Random Projections: Limits and Pathological Cases

arXiv 2404.10148 ↗First posted 15 Apr 2024cs.SI cs.DS cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Random Projections have been widely used to generate embeddings for various graph learning tasks due to their computational efficiency. The majority of applications have been justified through the Johnson-Lindenstrauss Lemma. In this paper, we take a step further and investigate how well dot product and cosine similarity are preserved by random projections when these are applied over the rows of the graph matrix. Our analysis provides new asymptotic and finite-sample results, identifies pathological cases, and tests them with numerical experiments. We specialize our fundamental results to a ranking application by computing the probability of random projections flipping the node ordering induced by their embeddings. We find that, depending on the degree distribution, the method produces especially unreliable embeddings for the dot product, regardless of whether the adjacency or the normalized transition matrix is used. With respect to the statistical noise introduced by random projections, we show that cosine similarity produces remarkably more precise approximations.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Apr 2024.

Builds on

11 of 42 references.

References · 11

  1. 2018Performance of Johnson-Lindenstrauss Transform for k-Means and k-Medians Clusteringcited by 53
  2. 2015Random-projection ensemble classificationcited by 29
  3. 2019Fast and Accurate Network Embeddings via Very Sparse Random Projectioncited by 29
  4. 2018Billion-scale Network Embedding with Iterative Random Projectioncited by 25
  5. 2018Fully Understanding the Hashing Trickcited by 11
  6. 2019Understanding Sparse JL for Feature Hashingcited by 9
  7. 2021Johnson-Lindenstrauss Lemma, Linear and Nonlinear Random Projections, Random Fourier Features, and Random Kitchen Sinks: Tutorial and Surveycited by 8
  8. 2023On Generalization Bounds for Projective Clusteringcited by 4
  9. 2022Approximate Euclidean lengths and distances beyond Johnson-Lindenstrausscited by 3
  10. 2014An Analysis of Random Projections in Cancelable Biometricscited by 2
  11. 2023Creating generalizable downstream graph models with random projectionscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.