mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Fully Understanding the Hashing Trick

arXiv 1805.08539 ↗First posted 22 May 2018cs.LG cs.DS math.FAcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Feature hashing, also known as em the hashing trick, introduced by Weinberger et al. (2009), is one of the key techniques used in scaling-up machine learning algorithms. Loosely speaking, feature hashing uses a random sparse projection matrix A : ℝn → ℝm (where m ll n) in order to reduce the dimension of the data from n to m while approximately preserving the Euclidean norm. Every column of A contains exactly one non-zero entry, equals to either -1 or 1. Weinberger et al. showed tail bounds on |Ax|22. Specifically they showed that for every varepsilon, δ, if |x|∞ / |x|2 is sufficiently small, and m is sufficiently large, then Pr[ ; | ;|Ax|22 - |x|22; | < varepsilon |x|22 ;] ≥ 1 - δ ;. These bounds were later extended by Dasgupta etal (2010) and most recently refined by Dahlgaard et al. (2017), however, the true nature of the performance of this key technique, and specifically the correct tradeoff between the pivotal parameters |x|∞ / |x|2, m, varepsilon, δ remained an open question. We settle this question by giving tight asymptotic bounds on the exact tradeoff between the central parameters, thus providing a complete understanding of the performance of feature hashing. We complement the asymptotic bound with empirical data, which shows that the constants "hiding" in the asymptotic notation are, in fact, very close to 1, thus further illustrating the tightness of the presented bounds in practice.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 22 May 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 4; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 2.

11 papers.