mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Understanding Sparse JL for Feature Hashing

arXiv 1903.03605 ↗First posted 8 Mar 2019stat.ML cs.DS cs.LGcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Feature hashing and other random projection schemes are commonly used to reduce the dimensionality of feature vectors. The goal is to efficiently project a high-dimensional feature vector living in ℝn into a much lower-dimensional space ℝm, while approximately preserving Euclidean norm. These schemes can be constructed using sparse random projections, for example using a sparse Johnson-Lindenstrauss (JL) transform. A line of work introduced by Weinberger et. al (ICML '09) analyzes the accuracy of sparse JL with sparsity 1 on feature vectors with small ℓ_∞-to-ℓ2 norm ratio. Recently, Freksen, Kamma, and Larsen (NeurIPS '18) closed this line of work by proving a tight tradeoff between ℓ_∞-to-ℓ2 norm ratio and accuracy for sparse JL with sparsity 1. In this paper, we demonstrate the benefits of using sparsity s greater than 1 in sparse JL on feature vectors. Our main result is a tight tradeoff between ℓ_∞-to-ℓ2 norm ratio and accuracy for a general sparsity s, that significantly generalizes the result of Freksen et. al. Our result theoretically demonstrates that sparse JL with s > 1 can have significantly better norm-preservation properties on feature vectors than sparse JL with s = 1; we also empirically demonstrate this finding.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 8 Mar 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 3; 2023: 2; 2024: 1.

9 papers.