Reactive Model Correction: Mitigating Harm to Task-Relevant Features via Conditional Bias Suppression
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep Neural Networks are prone to learning and relying on spurious correlations in the training data, which, for high-risk applications, can have fatal consequences. Various approaches to suppress model reliance on harmful features have been proposed that can be applied post-hoc without additional training. Whereas those methods can be applied with efficiency, they also tend to harm model performance by globally shifting the distribution of latent features. To mitigate unintended overcorrection of model behavior, we propose a reactive approach conditioned on model-derived knowledge and eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) insights. While the reactive approach can be applied to many post-hoc methods, we demonstrate the incorporation of reactivity in particular for P-ClArC (Projective Class Artifact Compensation), introducing a new method called R-ClArC (Reactive Class Artifact Compensation). Through rigorous experiments in controlled settings (FunnyBirds) and with a real-world dataset (ISIC2019), we show that introducing reactivity can minimize the detrimental effect of the applied correction while simultaneously ensuring low reliance on spurious features.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Apr 2024.
Builds on
32 of 48 references.
References · 32
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
- 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
- 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,928
- 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,309
- 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,304
- 2017BadNets: Identifying Vulnerabilities in the Machine Learning Model Supply Chaincited by 1,052
- 2017Skin Lesion Analysis Toward Melanoma Detection: A Challenge at the 2017 International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), Hosted by the International Skin Imaging Collaboration (ISIC)cited by 549
- 2021Editing Factual Knowledge in Language Modelscited by 548
- 2020Null It Out: Guarding Protected Attributes by Iterative Nullspace Projectioncited by 442
- 2019Unmasking Clever Hans Predictors and Assessing What Machines Really Learncited by 359
20 more
- 2017Right for the Right Reasons: Training Differentiable Models by Constraining their Explanationscited by 293
- 2019Interpretations are useful: penalizing explanations to align neural networks with prior knowledgecited by 144
- 2020Making deep neural networks right for the right scientific reasons by interacting with their explanationscited by 141
- 2022From Attribution Maps to Human-Understandable Explanations through Concept Relevance Propagationcited by 141
- 2023A Holistic Approach to Unifying Automatic Concept Extraction and Concept Importance Estimationcited by 108
- 2022A Whac-A-Mole Dilemma: Shortcuts Come in Multiples Where Mitigating One Amplifies Otherscited by 85
- 2023Discover and Cure: Concept-aware Mitigation of Spurious Correlationcited by 71
- 2019Towards Best Practice in Explaining Neural Network Decisions with LRPcited by 70
- 2021Editing a classifier by rewriting its prediction rulescited by 64
- 2021Software for Dataset-wide XAI: From Local Explanations to Global Insights with Zennit, CoRelAy, and ViRelAycited by 53
- 2023FunnyBirds: A Synthetic Vision Dataset for a Part-Based Analysis of Explainable AI Methodscited by 49
- 2022Spurious Features Everywhere -- Large-Scale Detection of Harmful Spurious Features in ImageNetcited by 41
- 2023Fast Diffusion-Based Counterfactuals for Shortcut Removal and Generationcited by 41
- 2022Probing Classifiers are Unreliable for Concept Removal and Detectioncited by 40
- 2019Embedding Human Knowledge into Deep Neural Network via Attention Mapcited by 33
- 2022Navigating Neural Space: Revisiting Concept Activation Vectors to Overcome Directional Divergencecited by 24
- 2023Understanding the (Extra-)Ordinary: Validating Deep Model Decisions with Prototypical Concept-based Explanationscited by 21
- 2023From Hope to Safety: Unlearning Biases of Deep Models via Gradient Penalization in Latent Spacecited by 20
- 2023Reveal to Revise: An Explainable AI Life Cycle for Iterative Bias Correction of Deep Modelscited by 17
- 2023Preemptively Pruning Clever-Hans Strategies in Deep Neural Networkscited by 9
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 5.
5 papers.
- 2025Mitigating Clever Hans Strategies in Image Classifiers through Generating Counterexamplescited by 6
- 2025Preserving Task-Relevant Information Under Linear Concept Removalcited by 3
- 2025On The Variability of Concept Activation Vectorscited by 3
- 2025Ensuring Medical AI Safety: Interpretability-Driven Detection and Mitigation of Spurious Model Behavior and Associated Datacited by 2
- 2025Post-Hoc Concept Disentanglement: From Correlated to Isolated Concept Representationscited by 1
- 2025Mitigating Clever Hans Strategies in Image Classifiers through Generating Counterexamples20 Oct 2025
- 2025On The Variability of Concept Activation Vectors28 Sep 2025
- 2025Preserving Task-Relevant Information Under Linear Concept Removal12 Jun 2025
- 2025Post-Hoc Concept Disentanglement: From Correlated to Isolated Concept Representations7 Mar 2025
- 2025Ensuring Medical AI Safety: Interpretability-Driven Detection and Mitigation of Spurious Model Behavior and Associated Data23 Jan 2025