mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

From Hope to Safety: Unlearning Biases of Deep Models via Gradient Penalization in Latent Space

arXiv 2308.09437 ↗First posted 18 Aug 2023cs.LG cs.AI cs.CVcited by 20

On the map: LLM safety and security → Machine unlearning

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep Neural Networks are prone to learning spurious correlations embedded in the training data, leading to potentially biased predictions. This poses risks when deploying these models for high-stake decision-making, such as in medical applications. Current methods for post-hoc model correction either require input-level annotations which are only possible for spatially localized biases, or augment the latent feature space, thereby hoping to enforce the right reasons. We present a novel method for model correction on the concept level that explicitly reduces model sensitivity towards biases via gradient penalization. When modeling biases via Concept Activation Vectors, we highlight the importance of choosing robust directions, as traditional regression-based approaches such as Support Vector Machines tend to result in diverging directions. We effectively mitigate biases in controlled and real-world settings on the ISIC, Bone Age, ImageNet and CelebA datasets using VGG, ResNet and EfficientNet architectures. Code is available on https://github.com/frederikpahde/rrclarc.

Key facts. Cited by 20 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Machine unlearning, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 19 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Aug 2023.

Builds on

19 of 34 references.

References · 19

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  3. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
  4. 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,679
  5. 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,278
  6. 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,309
  7. 2017Skin Lesion Analysis Toward Melanoma Detection: A Challenge at the 2017 International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), Hosted by the International Skin Imaging Collaboration (ISIC)cited by 549
  8. 2019Unmasking Clever Hans Predictors and Assessing What Machines Really Learncited by 359
  9. 2017Right for the Right Reasons: Training Differentiable Models by Constraining their Explanationscited by 293
  10. 2019BCN20000: Dermoscopic Lesions in the Wildcited by 224
  11. 2019Interpretations are useful: penalizing explanations to align neural networks with prior knowledgecited by 144
  12. 2020Making deep neural networks right for the right scientific reasons by interacting with their explanationscited by 141
7 more
  1. 2021Can contrastive learning avoid shortcut solutions?cited by 114
  2. 2022A Whac-A-Mole Dilemma: Shortcuts Come in Multiples Where Mitigating One Amplifies Otherscited by 85
  3. 2019Towards Best Practice in Explaining Neural Network Decisions with LRPcited by 70
  4. 2021Causally motivated Shortcut Removal Using Auxiliary Labelscited by 55
  5. 2022Concept-level Debugging of Part-Prototype Networkscited by 52
  6. 2021Finding and Fixing Spurious Patterns with Explanationscited by 38
  7. 2021Robust Semantic Interpretability: Revisiting Concept Activation Vectorscited by 15

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 7; 2025: 7; 2026: 6.

20 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2024Rethinking Machine Unlearning for Large Language Modelscited by 247
  2. 2024Concept-Based Explanations in Computer Vision: Where Are We and Where Could We Go?cited by 17
  3. 2024Contestable AI needs Computational Argumentationcited by 12
  4. 2024Controllable Continual Test-Time Adaptationcited by 6
  5. 2025Mitigating Clever Hans Strategies in Image Classifiers through Generating Counterexamplescited by 6
  6. 2024Reactive Model Correction: Mitigating Harm to Task-Relevant Features via Conditional Bias Suppressioncited by 5
  7. 2026Visual Disentangled Diffusion Autoencoders: Scalable Counterfactual Generation for Foundation Modelscited by 4
  8. 2025Attribution-Guided Pruning for Insight and Control: Circuit Discovery and Targeted Correction in Small-scale LLMscited by 3
  9. 2025On The Variability of Concept Activation Vectorscited by 3
  10. 2024Contrastive Sparse Autoencoders for Interpreting Planning of Chess-Playing Agentscited by 2
  11. 2024Towards certifiable AI in aviation: landscape, challenges, and opportunitiescited by 2
  12. 2025Ensuring Medical AI Safety: Interpretability-Driven Detection and Mitigation of Spurious Model Behavior and Associated Datacited by 2
8 more
  1. 2025Concept activation vectors: a unifying view and adversarial attackscited by 1
  2. 2025TDHook: A Lightweight Framework for Interpretabilitycited by 0
  3. 2025Probing the Probes: Methods and Metrics for Concept Alignmentcited by 0
  4. 2026E-TCAV: Formalizing Penultimate Proxies for Efficient Concept Based Interpretabilitycited by 0
  5. 2026α-TCAV: A Unified Framework for Testing with Concept Activation Vectorscited by 0
  6. 2026Bias Leaves a Gradient Trail: Label-Free Bias Identification via Gradient Probes on Concept Decompositionscited by 0
  7. 2026ICON Decomposition: Auditing deep neural networks for shortcuts by decomposing layer-wise representations using conceptscited by 0
  8. 2026Towards Fast and Disentangled Counterfactuals for Visual Foundation Modelscited by 0