mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Privacy at a Price: Exploring its Dual Impact on AI Fairness

arXiv 2404.09391 ↗First posted 15 Apr 2024cs.LG cs.AI cs.CRcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The worldwide adoption of machine learning (ML) and deep learning models, particularly in critical sectors, such as healthcare and finance, presents substantial challenges in maintaining individual privacy and fairness. These two elements are vital to a trustworthy environment for learning systems. While numerous studies have concentrated on protecting individual privacy through differential privacy (DP) mechanisms, emerging research indicates that differential privacy in machine learning models can unequally impact separate demographic subgroups regarding prediction accuracy. This leads to a fairness concern, and manifests as biased performance. Although the prevailing view is that enhancing privacy intensifies fairness disparities, a smaller, yet significant, subset of research suggests the opposite view. In this article, with extensive evaluation results, we demonstrate that the impact of differential privacy on fairness is not monotonous. Instead, we observe that the accuracy disparity initially grows as more DP noise (enhanced privacy) is added to the ML process, but subsequently diminishes at higher privacy levels with even more noise. Moreover, implementing gradient clipping in the differentially private stochastic gradient descent ML method can mitigate the negative impact of DP noise on fairness. This mitigation is achieved by moderating the disparity growth through a lower clipping threshold.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Apr 2024.

Builds on

9 of 15 references.

References · 9

  1. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
  2. 2016Semi-supervised Knowledge Transfer for Deep Learning from Private Training Datacited by 347
  3. 2019Differential Privacy Has Disparate Impact on Model Accuracycited by 316
  4. 2020On the Privacy Risks of Algorithmic Fairnesscited by 82
  5. 2019Fair Decision Making using Privacy-Protected Datacited by 58
  6. 2021Decision Making with Differential Privacy under a Fairness Lenscited by 32
  7. 2021DP-SGD vs PATE: Which Has Less Disparate Impact on Model Accuracy?cited by 32
  8. 2022Post-processing of Differentially Private Data: A Fairness Perspectivecited by 9
  9. 2023On the Fairness Impacts of Private Ensembles Modelscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.