Post-processing of Differentially Private Data: A Fairness Perspective
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Post-processing immunity is a fundamental property of differential privacy: it enables arbitrary data-independent transformations to differentially private outputs without affecting their privacy guarantees. Post-processing is routinely applied in data-release applications, including census data, which are then used to make allocations with substantial societal impacts. This paper shows that post-processing causes disparate impacts on individuals or groups and analyzes two critical settings: the release of differentially private datasets and the use of such private datasets for downstream decisions, such as the allocation of funds informed by US Census data. In the first setting, the paper proposes tight bounds on the unfairness of traditional post-processing mechanisms, giving a unique tool to decision-makers to quantify the disparate impacts introduced by their release. In the second setting, this paper proposes a novel post-processing mechanism that is (approximately) optimal under different fairness metrics, either reducing fairness issues substantially or reducing the cost of privacy. The theoretical analysis is complemented with numerical simulations on Census data.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 14 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jan 2022.
Builds on
6 of 14 references.
References · 6
- 2018Differentially Private Fair Learningcited by 76
- 2019Fair Decision Making using Privacy-Protected Datacited by 58
- 2021Decision Making with Differential Privacy under a Fairness Lenscited by 32
- 2020Bias and Variance of Post-processing in Differential Privacycited by 14
- 2018An Economic Analysis of Privacy Protection and Statistical Accuracy as Social Choicescited by 6
- 2019Differential Privacy for Power Grid Obfuscationcited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 3; 2024: 3; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
9 papers.
- 2022Differential Privacy and Fairness in Decisions and Learning Tasks: A Surveycited by 47
- 2023A Bias-Accuracy-Privacy Trilemma for Statistical Estimationcited by 12
- 2023Node Injection Link Stealing Attackcited by 3
- 2023On The Fairness Impacts of Hardware Selection in Machine Learningcited by 2
- 2024Fairness Issues and Mitigations in (Differentially Private) Socio-Demographic Data Processescited by 2
- 2024Privacy at a Price: Exploring its Dual Impact on AI Fairnesscited by 1
- 2024Differentially Private Data Release on Graphs: Inefficiencies and Unfairnesscited by 0
- 2025Differential Privacy in Machine Learning: A Survey from Symbolic AI to LLMscited by 0
- 2026Differentially Private Natural Gradient Descentcited by 0
- 2026Differentially Private Natural Gradient Descent7 Jul 2026
- 2025Differential Privacy in Machine Learning: A Survey from Symbolic AI to LLMs13 Jun 2025
- 2024Fairness Issues and Mitigations in (Differentially Private) Socio-Demographic Data Processes16 Aug 2024
- 2024Differentially Private Data Release on Graphs: Inefficiencies and Unfairness8 Aug 2024
- 2024Privacy at a Price: Exploring its Dual Impact on AI Fairness15 Apr 2024
- 2023On The Fairness Impacts of Hardware Selection in Machine Learning6 Dec 2023
- 2023Node Injection Link Stealing Attack25 Jul 2023
- 2023A Bias-Accuracy-Privacy Trilemma for Statistical Estimation30 Jan 2023
- 2022Differential Privacy and Fairness in Decisions and Learning Tasks: A Survey16 Feb 2022