Provable Interactive Learning with Hindsight Instruction Feedback
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study interactive learning in a setting where the agent has to generate a response (e.g., an action or trajectory) given a context and an instruction. In contrast, to typical approaches that train the system using reward or expert supervision on response, we study learning with hindsight instruction where a teacher provides an instruction that is most suitable for the agent's generated response. This hindsight labeling of instruction is often easier to provide than providing expert supervision of the optimal response which may require expert knowledge or can be impractical to elicit. We initiate the theoretical analysis of interactive learning with hindsight labeling. We first provide a lower bound showing that in general, the regret of any algorithm must scale with the size of the agent's response space. We then study a specialized setting where the underlying instruction-response distribution can be decomposed as a low-rank matrix. We introduce an algorithm called LORIL for this setting and show that its regret scales as √T where T is the number of rounds and depends on the intrinsic rank but does not depend on the size of the agent's response space. We provide experiments in two domains showing that LORIL outperforms baselines even when the low-rank assumption is violated.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Apr 2024.
Builds on
27 of 43 references.
References · 27
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2017Hindsight Experience Replaycited by 1,096
- 2019Provably Efficient Reinforcement Learning with Linear Function Approximationcited by 514
- 2017Minimax Regret Bounds for Reinforcement Learningcited by 500
- 2018Speaker-Follower Models for Vision-and-Language Navigationcited by 337
- 2017Overcoming Exploration in Reinforcement Learning with Demonstrationscited by 322
- 2021Bridging Offline Reinforcement Learning and Imitation Learning: A Tale of Pessimismcited by 275
- 2020FLAMBE: Structural Complexity and Representation Learning of Low Rank MDPscited by 232
- 2021Bellman Eluder Dimension: New Rich Classes of RL Problems, and Sample-Efficient Algorithmscited by 222
15 more
- 2021The Statistical Complexity of Interactive Decision Makingcited by 208
- 2014Taming the Monster: A Fast and Simple Algorithm for Contextual Banditscited by 200
- 2019Kinematic State Abstraction and Provably Efficient Rich-Observation Reinforcement Learningcited by 114
- 2018Mapping Instructions to Actions in 3D Environments with Visual Goal Predictioncited by 101
- 2020Stochastic Bandits with Linear Constraintscited by 68
- 2020Grounded Language Learning Fast and Slowcited by 54
- 2020Generalized Hindsight for Reinforcement Learningcited by 51
- 2022Exploration via Elliptical Episodic Bonusescited by 51
- 2015Listen, Attend, and Walk: Neural Mapping of Navigational Instructions to Action Sequencescited by 50
- 2022Making Linear MDPs Practical via Contrastive Representation Learningcited by 49
- 2019Learning to Map Natural Language Instructions to Physical Quadcopter Control using Simulated Flightcited by 43
- 2023Goal Representations for Instruction Following: A Semi-Supervised Language Interface to Controlcited by 32
- 2023Tight Guarantees for Interactive Decision Making with the Decision-Estimation Coefficientcited by 29
- 2021Interactive Learning from Activity Descriptioncited by 26
- 2021Agnostic Reinforcement Learning with Low-Rank MDPs and Rich Observationscited by 13
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.