Exploring Explainability in Video Action Recognition
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Image Classification and Video Action Recognition are perhaps the two most foundational tasks in computer vision. Consequently, explaining the inner workings of trained deep neural networks is of prime importance. While numerous efforts focus on explaining the decisions of trained deep neural networks in image classification, exploration in the domain of its temporal version, video action recognition, has been scant. In this work, we take a deeper look at this problem. We begin by revisiting Grad-CAM, one of the popular feature attribution methods for Image Classification, and its extension to Video Action Recognition tasks and examine the method's limitations. To address these, we introduce Video-TCAV, by building on TCAV for Image Classification tasks, which aims to quantify the importance of specific concepts in the decision-making process of Video Action Recognition models. As the scalable generation of concepts is still an open problem, we propose a machine-assisted approach to generate spatial and spatiotemporal concepts relevant to Video Action Recognition for testing Video-TCAV. We then establish the importance of temporally-varying concepts by demonstrating the superiority of dynamic spatiotemporal concepts over trivial spatial concepts. In conclusion, we introduce a framework for investigating hypotheses in action recognition and quantitatively testing them, thus advancing research in the explainability of deep neural networks used in video action recognition.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Apr 2024.
Builds on
13 of 17 references.
References · 13
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
- 2017Quo Vadis, Action Recognition? A New Model and the Kinetics Datasetcited by 3,259
- 2023Stable Video Diffusion: Scaling Latent Video Diffusion Models to Large Datasetscited by 2,526
- 2015Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localizationcited by 2,430
- 2017The Kinetics Human Action Video Datasetcited by 1,894
- 2018SlowFast Networks for Video Recognitioncited by 1,862
- 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,309
- 2022YOLOv7: Trainable bag-of-freebies sets new state-of-the-art for real-time object detectorscited by 978
- 2017Interpretation of Neural Networks is Fragilecited by 443
- 2017The (Un)reliability of saliency methodscited by 331
- 2018On the Robustness of Interpretability Methodscited by 310
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 1.
5 papers.
- 2025Disentangled Concepts Speak Louder Than Words: Explainable Video Action Recognitioncited by 2
- 2025Concepts in Motion: Temporal Concept Bottleneck Model for Interpretable Video Classificationcited by 1
- 2025Label-Efficient Skeleton-based Recognition with Stable-Invertible Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 0
- 2025Active Learning for GCN-based Action Recognitioncited by 0
- 2026TimeSliver : Symbolic-Linear Decomposition for Explainable Time Series Classificationcited by 0
- 2026TimeSliver : Symbolic-Linear Decomposition for Explainable Time Series Classification29 Jan 2026
- 2025Active Learning for GCN-based Action Recognition26 Nov 2025
- 2025Label-Efficient Skeleton-based Recognition with Stable-Invertible Graph Convolutional Networks21 Nov 2025
- 2025Disentangled Concepts Speak Louder Than Words: Explainable Video Action Recognition5 Nov 2025
- 2025Concepts in Motion: Temporal Concept Bottleneck Model for Interpretable Video Classification25 Sep 2025