Data Limitations for Modeling Top-Down Effects on Drivers' Attention
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Driving is a visuomotor task, i.e., there is a connection between what drivers see and what they do. While some models of drivers' gaze account for top-down effects of drivers' actions, the majority learn only bottom-up correlations between human gaze and driving footage. The crux of the problem is lack of public data with annotations that could be used to train top-down models and evaluate how well models of any kind capture effects of task on attention. As a result, top-down models are trained and evaluated on private data and public benchmarks measure only the overall fit to human data. In this paper, we focus on data limitations by examining four large-scale public datasets, DR(eye)VE, BDD-A, MAAD, and LBW, used to train and evaluate algorithms for drivers' gaze prediction. We define a set of driving tasks (lateral and longitudinal maneuvers) and context elements (intersections and right-of-way) known to affect drivers' attention, augment the datasets with annotations based on the said definitions, and analyze the characteristics of data recording and processing pipelines w.r.t. capturing what the drivers see and do. In sum, the contributions of this work are: 1) quantifying biases of the public datasets, 2) examining performance of the SOTA bottom-up models on subsets of the data involving non-trivial drivers' actions, 3) linking shortcomings of the bottom-up models to data limitations, and 4) recommendations for future data collection and processing. The new annotations and code for reproducing the results is available at https://github.com/ykotseruba/SCOUT.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Apr 2024.
Builds on
12 of 38 references.
References · 12
- 2015ORB-SLAM: a Versatile and Accurate Monocular SLAM Systemcited by 983
- 2016What do different evaluation metrics tell us about saliency models?cited by 184
- 2016End-to-end Learning of Driving Models from Large-scale Video Datasetscited by 147
- 2017Predicting the Driver's Focus of Attention: the DR(eye)VE Projectcited by 79
- 2019DADA: Driver Attention Prediction in Driving Accident Scenarioscited by 69
- 2017Predicting Driver Attention in Critical Situationscited by 61
- 2020ViNet: Pushing the limits of Visual Modality for Audio-Visual Saliency Predictioncited by 42
- 2013Actions in the Eye: Dynamic Gaze Datasets and Learnt Saliency Models for Visual Recognitioncited by 36
- 2019MEDIRL: Predicting the Visual Attention of Drivers via Maximum Entropy Deep Inverse Reinforcement Learningcited by 29
- 2021Behavioral Research and Practical Models of Drivers' Attentioncited by 9
- 2021MAAD: A Model and Dataset for "Attended Awareness" in Drivingcited by 9
- 2023Understanding and Modeling the Effects of Task and Context on Drivers' Gaze Allocationcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
2 papers.