mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

PoliTune: Analyzing the Impact of Data Selection and Fine-Tuning on Economic and Political Biases in Large Language Models

arXiv 2404.08699 ↗First posted 10 Apr 2024cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In an era where language models are increasingly integrated into decision-making and communication, understanding the biases within Large Language Models (LLMs) becomes imperative, especially when these models are applied in the economic and political domains. This work investigates the impact of fine-tuning and data selection on economic and political biases in LLMs. In this context, we introduce PoliTune, a fine-tuning methodology to explore the systematic aspects of aligning LLMs with specific ideologies, mindful of the biases that arise from their extensive training on diverse datasets. Distinct from earlier efforts that either focus on smaller models or entail resource-intensive pre-training, PoliTune employs Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) techniques, which allow for the alignment of LLMs with targeted ideologies by modifying a small subset of parameters. We introduce a systematic method for using the open-source LLM Llama3-70B for dataset selection, annotation, and synthesizing a preferences dataset for Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) to align the model with a given political ideology. We assess the effectiveness of PoliTune through both quantitative and qualitative evaluations of aligning open-source LLMs (Llama3-8B and Mistral-7B) to different ideologies. Our work analyzes the potential of embedding specific biases into LLMs and contributes to the dialogue on the ethical application of AI, highlighting the importance of deploying AI in a manner that aligns with societal values.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Apr 2024.

Builds on

13 of 28 references.

References · 13

  1. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
  2. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
  3. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  4. 2023QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMscited by 3,355
  5. 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructionscited by 2,674
  6. 2018Datasheets for Datasetscited by 1,371
  7. 2018Model Cards for Model Reportingcited by 1,068
  8. 2020StereoSet: Measuring stereotypical bias in pretrained language modelscited by 911
  9. 2023LLaMA-Adapter: Efficient Fine-tuning of Language Models with Zero-init Attentioncited by 776
  10. 2023LLaMA-Adapter V2: Parameter-Efficient Visual Instruction Modelcited by 602
  11. 2021Towards Understanding and Mitigating Social Biases in Language Modelscited by 294
  12. 2023From Pretraining Data to Language Models to Downstream Tasks: Tracking the Trails of Political Biases Leading to Unfair NLP Modelscited by 257
1 more
  1. 2023AI in the Gray: Exploring Moderation Policies in Dialogic Large Language Models vs. Human Answers in Controversial Topicscited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 0; 2026: 8.

11 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024The Political Preferences of LLMs
  2. 2024On the Relationship between Truth and Political Bias in Language Models
  3. 2025Examining Alignment of Large Language Models through Representative Heuristics: The Case of Political Stereotypes
  4. 2026Political Alignment in Large Language Models: A Multidimensional Audit of Psychometric Identity and Behavioral Bias
  5. 2025Measuring Political Preferences in AI Systems: An Integrative Approach
  6. 2025Are LLMs (Really) Ideological? An IRT-based Analysis and Alignment Tool for Perceived Socio-Economic Bias in LLMs
  7. 2024Optimizing Language Models for Human Preferences is a Causal Inference Problem
  8. 2026Ideological Bias in LLMs' Economic Causal Reasoning