Scarce Resource Allocations That Rely On Machine Learning Should Be Randomized
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Contrary to traditional deterministic notions of algorithmic fairness, this paper argues that fairly allocating scarce resources using machine learning often requires randomness. We address why, when, and how to randomize by proposing stochastic procedures that more adequately account for all of the claims that individuals have to allocations of social goods or opportunities.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 12 Apr 2024.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 5; 2026: 1.
7 papers.
- 2025Correlated Errors in Large Language Modelscited by 42
- 2025Systemizing Multiplicity: The Curious Case of Arbitrariness in Machine Learningcited by 17
- 2024Learning treatment effects while treating those in needcited by 8
- 2025The Value of Prediction in Identifying the Worst-Offcited by 5
- 2025Unequal Uncertainty: Rethinking Algorithmic Interventions for Mitigating Discrimination from AIcited by 0
- 2025Data as a Lever: A Neighbouring Datasets Perspective on Predictive Multiplicitycited by 0
- 2026On the Meta-Design of Allocation Problemscited by 0
- 2026On the Meta-Design of Allocation Problems9 Feb 2026
- 2025Data as a Lever: A Neighbouring Datasets Perspective on Predictive Multiplicity24 Oct 2025
- 2025Unequal Uncertainty: Rethinking Algorithmic Interventions for Mitigating Discrimination from AI11 Aug 2025
- 2025Correlated Errors in Large Language Models9 Jun 2025
- 2025The Value of Prediction in Identifying the Worst-Off31 Jan 2025
- 2025Systemizing Multiplicity: The Curious Case of Arbitrariness in Machine Learning24 Jan 2025
- 2024Learning treatment effects while treating those in need10 Jul 2024