mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

PEAVS: Perceptual Evaluation of Audio-Visual Synchrony Grounded in Viewers' Opinion Scores

arXiv 2404.07336 ↗First posted 10 Apr 2024cs.CV cs.MM eess.AScited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent advancements in audio-visual generative modeling have been propelled by progress in deep learning and the availability of data-rich benchmarks. However, the growth is not attributed solely to models and benchmarks. Universally accepted evaluation metrics also play an important role in advancing the field. While there are many metrics available to evaluate audio and visual content separately, there is a lack of metrics that offer a quantitative and interpretable measure of audio-visual synchronization for videos "in the wild". To address this gap, we first created a large scale human annotated dataset (100+ hrs) representing nine types of synchronization errors in audio-visual content and how human perceive them. We then developed a PEAVS (Perceptual Evaluation of Audio-Visual Synchrony) score, a novel automatic metric with a 5-point scale that evaluates the quality of audio-visual synchronization. We validate PEAVS using a newly generated dataset, achieving a Pearson correlation of 0.79 at the set level and 0.54 at the clip level when compared to human labels. In our experiments, we observe a relative gain 50% over a natural extension of Fr'echet based metrics for Audio-Visual synchrony, confirming PEAVS efficacy in objectively modeling subjective perceptions of audio-visual synchronization for videos "in the wild".

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Apr 2024.

Builds on

23 of 42 references.

References · 23

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,177
  3. 2017Quo Vadis, Action Recognition? A New Model and the Kinetics Datasetcited by 3,270
  4. 2016Improved Techniques for Training GANscited by 2,970
  5. 2021CLIPScore: A Reference-free Evaluation Metric for Image Captioningcited by 2,424
  6. 2018Demystifying MMD GANscited by 1,293
  7. 2018Towards Accurate Generative Models of Video: A New Metric & Challengescited by 1,234
  8. 2017VoxCeleb: a large-scale speaker identification datasetcited by 732
  9. 2016CNN Architectures for Large-Scale Audio Classificationcited by 704
  10. 2020VGGSound: A Large-scale Audio-Visual Datasetcited by 648
  11. 2019Multimodal Transformer for Unaligned Multimodal Language Sequencescited by 645
  12. 2017Look, Listen and Learncited by 458
11 more
  1. 2018SDR - half-baked or well done?cited by 423
  2. 2017Objects that Soundcited by 256
  3. 2022MM-Diffusion: Learning Multi-Modal Diffusion Models for Joint Audio and Video Generationcited by 227
  4. 2023Diff-Foley: Synchronized Video-to-Audio Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 134
  5. 2017TasNet: time-domain audio separation network for real-time, single-channel speech separationcited by 115
  6. 2020ViSQOL v3: An Open Source Production Ready Objective Speech and Audio Metriccited by 79
  7. 2021Audio-Visual Synchronisation in the wildcited by 40
  8. 2022Sparse in Space and Time: Audio-visual Synchronisation with Trainable Selectorscited by 26
  9. 2020A Differentiable Perceptual Audio Metric Learned from Just Noticeable Differencescited by 23
  10. 2020AlignNet: A Unifying Approach to Audio-Visual Alignmentcited by 13
  11. 2021DPLM: A Deep Perceptual Spatial-Audio Localization Metriccited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 5; 2026: 5.

13 papers.

Sort:

By area: