FreeEval: A Modular Framework for Trustworthy and Efficient Evaluation of Large Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The rapid development of large language model (LLM) evaluation methodologies and datasets has led to a profound challenge: integrating state-of-the-art evaluation techniques cost-effectively while ensuring reliability, reproducibility, and efficiency. Currently, there is a notable absence of a unified and adaptable framework that seamlessly integrates various evaluation approaches. Moreover, the reliability of evaluation findings is often questionable due to potential data contamination, with the evaluation efficiency commonly overlooked when facing the substantial costs associated with LLM inference. In response to these challenges, we introduce FreeEval, a modular and scalable framework crafted to enable trustworthy and efficient automatic evaluations of LLMs. Firstly, FreeEval's unified abstractions simplify the integration and improve the transparency of diverse evaluation methodologies, encompassing dynamic evaluation that demand sophisticated LLM interactions. Secondly, the framework integrates meta-evaluation techniques like human evaluation and data contamination detection, which, along with dynamic evaluation modules in the platform, enhance the fairness of the evaluation outcomes. Lastly, FreeEval is designed with a high-performance infrastructure, including distributed computation and caching strategies, enabling extensive evaluations across multi-node, multi-GPU clusters for open-source and proprietary LLMs.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 50 of its 87 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Apr 2024.
Builds on
50 of 87 references.
References · 50
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
- 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
- 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,854
- 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,710
38 more
- 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,018
- 2022OPT: Open Pre-trained Transformer Language Modelscited by 3,464
- 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,919
- 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructionscited by 2,674
- 2023Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4cited by 2,579
- 2019HuggingFace's Transformers: State-of-the-art Natural Language Processingcited by 2,201
- 2022Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language modelscited by 1,970
- 2022BLOOM: A 176B-Parameter Open-Access Multilingual Language Modelcited by 1,968
- 2023Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scalingcited by 1,734
- 2023Large Language Models are not Fair Evaluatorscited by 1,050
- 2023A Multitask, Multilingual, Multimodal Evaluation of ChatGPT on Reasoning, Hallucination, and Interactivitycited by 888
- 2023AlpacaFarm: A Simulation Framework for Methods that Learn from Human Feedbackcited by 738
- 2023Can Large Language Models Be an Alternative to Human Evaluations?cited by 729
- 2023ChatEval: Towards Better LLM-based Evaluators through Multi-Agent Debatecited by 724
- 2021BARTScore: Evaluating Generated Text as Text Generationcited by 719
- 2023C-Eval: A Multi-Level Multi-Discipline Chinese Evaluation Suite for Foundation Modelscited by 694
- 2021MAUVE: Measuring the Gap Between Neural Text and Human Text using Divergence Frontierscited by 466
- 2023Large Language Models Are Not Robust Multiple Choice Selectorscited by 454
- 2019How to Fine-Tune BERT for Text Classification?cited by 409
- 2023The Reversal Curse: LLMs trained on "A is B" fail to learn "B is A"cited by 399
- 2020Fine-Tuning Pretrained Language Models: Weight Initializations, Data Orders, and Early Stoppingcited by 377
- 2023NLP Evaluation in trouble: On the Need to Measure LLM Data Contamination for each Benchmarkcited by 339
- 2023PandaLM: An Automatic Evaluation Benchmark for LLM Instruction Tuning Optimizationcited by 311
- 2023Evaluating Large Language Models at Evaluating Instruction Followingcited by 290
- 2020CLUE: A Chinese Language Understanding Evaluation Benchmarkcited by 277
- 2021ZeRO-Infinity: Breaking the GPU Memory Wall for Extreme Scale Deep Learningcited by 253
- 2017Why We Need New Evaluation Metrics for NLGcited by 232
- 2023Proving Test Set Contamination in Black Box Language Modelscited by 227
- 2023Evaluating Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 200
- 2022Leveraging Large Language Models for Multiple Choice Question Answeringcited by 199
- 2023Don't Make Your LLM an Evaluation Benchmark Cheatercited by 194
- 2023PRD: Peer Rank and Discussion Improve Large Language Model based Evaluationscited by 114
- 2023Skywork: A More Open Bilingual Foundation Modelcited by 110
- 2023Cerebras-GPT: Open Compute-Optimal Language Models Trained on the Cerebras Wafer-Scale Clustercited by 106
- 2021The Perils of Using Mechanical Turk to Evaluate Open-Ended Text Generationcited by 96
- 2022GLUE-X: Evaluating Natural Language Understanding Models from an Out-of-distribution Generalization Perspectivecited by 72
- 2023Supervised Knowledge Makes Large Language Models Better In-context Learnerscited by 20
- 2024CoderUJB: An Executable and Unified Java Benchmark for Practical Programming Scenarioscited by 11
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 5; 2026: 1.
7 papers.
- 2025RewardAnything: Generalizable Principle-Following Reward Modelscited by 27
- 2024Reasoning Through Execution: Unifying Process and Outcome Rewards for Code Generationcited by 21
- 2025An Empirical Analysis of Uncertainty in Large Language Model Evaluationscited by 20
- 2025SAEMark: Steering Personalized Multilingual LLM Watermarks with Sparse Autoencoderscited by 5
- 2025Behavioral Fingerprinting of Large Language Modelscited by 5
- 2026From Curiosity to Caution: Mitigating Reward Hacking for Best-of-N with Pessimismcited by 2
- 2025Generating Reading Comprehension Exercises with Large Language Models for Educational Applicationscited by 0
- 2026From Curiosity to Caution: Mitigating Reward Hacking for Best-of-N with Pessimism6 Apr 2026
- 2025Generating Reading Comprehension Exercises with Large Language Models for Educational Applications24 Nov 2025
- 2025Behavioral Fingerprinting of Large Language Models2 Sep 2025
- 2025SAEMark: Steering Personalized Multilingual LLM Watermarks with Sparse Autoencoders11 Aug 2025
- 2025RewardAnything: Generalizable Principle-Following Reward Models4 Jun 2025
- 2025An Empirical Analysis of Uncertainty in Large Language Model Evaluations15 Feb 2025
- 2024Reasoning Through Execution: Unifying Process and Outcome Rewards for Code Generation19 Dec 2024