mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

SAEMark: Steering Personalized Multilingual LLM Watermarks with Sparse Autoencoders

arXiv 2508.08211 ↗First posted 11 Aug 2025cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 5

On the map: LLM safety and security → Watermarking generated content and models

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Watermarking LLM-generated text is critical for content attribution and misinformation prevention. However, existing methods compromise text quality, require white-box model access and logit manipulation. These limitations exclude API-based models and multilingual scenarios. We propose SAEMark, a general framework for post-hoc multi-bit watermarking that embeds personalized messages solely via inference-time, feature-based rejection sampling without altering model logits or requiring training. Our approach operates on deterministic features extracted from generated text, selecting outputs whose feature statistics align with key-derived targets. This framework naturally generalizes across languages and domains while preserving text quality through sampling LLM outputs instead of modifying. We provide theoretical guarantees relating watermark success probability and compute budget that hold for any suitable feature extractor. Empirically, we demonstrate the framework's effectiveness using Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs), achieving superior detection accuracy and text quality. Experiments across 4 datasets show SAEMark's consistent performance, with 99.7% F1 on English and strong multi-bit detection accuracy. SAEMark establishes a new paradigm for scalable watermarking that works out-of-the-box with closed-source LLMs while enabling content attribution.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Placed in Watermarking generated content and models, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 60 of its 81 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Aug 2025.

Builds on

60 of 81 references.

Closest ancestors · 27

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Robust Multi-bit Text Watermark with LLM-based Paraphrasers4 Dec
  2. 2024WAPITI: A Watermark for Finetuned Open-Source LLMs9 Oct
  3. 2024Efficiently Identifying Watermarked Segments in Mixed-Source Texts4 Oct
  4. 2024A Watermark for Black-Box Language Models2 Oct
  5. 2024PersonaMark: Personalized LLM watermarking for model protection and user attribution15 Sep
  6. 2024PostMark: A Robust Blackbox Watermark for Large Language Models20 Jun
  7. 2024Black-Box Detection of Language Model Watermarks28 May
  8. 2024MarkLLM: An Open-Source Toolkit for LLM Watermarking16 May
  9. 2024CodeIP: A Grammar-Guided Multi-Bit Watermark for Large Language Models of Code24 Apr
  10. 2024WaterJudge: Quality-Detection Trade-off when Watermarking Large Language Models28 Mar
  11. 2024An Entropy-based Text Watermarking Detection Method20 Mar
  12. 2024Towards Better Statistical Understanding of Watermarking LLMs19 Mar
15 more
  1. 2024Token-Specific Watermarking with Enhanced Detectability and Semantic Coherence for Large Language Models28 Feb
  2. 2024Provably Robust Multi-bit Watermarking for AI-generated Text30 Jan
  3. 2023On the Learnability of Watermarks for Language Models7 Dec
  4. 2023REMARK-LLM: A Robust and Efficient Watermarking Framework for Generative Large Language Models18 Oct
  5. 2023Unbiased Watermark for Large Language Models22 Sep
  6. 2023Advancing Beyond Identification: Multi-bit Watermark for Large Language Models1 Aug
  7. 2023Towards Codable Watermarking for Injecting Multi-bits Information to LLMs29 Jul
  8. 2023Robust Distortion-free Watermarks for Language Models28 Jul
  9. 2023Provable Robust Watermarking for AI-Generated Text30 Jun
  10. 2023Who Wrote this Code? Watermarking for Code Generation24 May
  11. 2023Robust Multi-bit Natural Language Watermarking through Invariant Features3 May
  12. 2023Paraphrasing evades detectors of AI-generated text, but retrieval is an effective defense23 Mar
  13. 2023Can AI-Generated Text be Reliably Detected?17 Mar
  14. 2023A Watermark for Large Language Models24 Jan
  15. 2022Distillation-Resistant Watermarking for Model Protection in NLP7 Oct

Other references · 33

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,106
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,320
  3. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,278
  4. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,856
  5. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,549
  6. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,486
  7. 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,880
  8. 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,840
  9. 2024GPT-4o System Cardcited by 4,536
  10. 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,573
  11. 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructionscited by 2,693
  12. 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,391
21 more
  1. 2024DeepSeek-Coder: When the Large Language Model Meets Programming -- The Rise of Code Intelligencecited by 1,173
  2. 2023PaLM 2 Technical Reportcited by 1,162
  3. 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 950
  4. 2024Gemma: Open Models Based on Gemini Research and Technologycited by 908
  5. 2023A Multitask, Multilingual, Multimodal Evaluation of ChatGPT on Reasoning, Hallucination, and Interactivitycited by 894
  6. 2019Defending Against Neural Fake Newscited by 559
  7. 2019How to Fine-Tune BERT for Text Classification?cited by 411
  8. 2024Gemma Scope: Open Sparse Autoencoders Everywhere All At Once on Gemma 2cited by 386
  9. 2020Fine-Tuning Pretrained Language Models: Weight Initializations, Data Orders, and Early Stoppingcited by 381
  10. 2023PandaLM: An Automatic Evaluation Benchmark for LLM Instruction Tuning Optimizationcited by 313
  11. 2023RADAR: Robust AI-Text Detection via Adversarial Learningcited by 188
  12. 2020Automatic Detection of Machine Generated Text: A Critical Surveycited by 165
  13. 2024Llama Scope: Extracting Millions of Features from Llama-3.1-8B with Sparse Autoencoderscited by 137
  14. 2024The BiGGen Bench: A Principled Benchmark for Fine-grained Evaluation of Language Models with Language Modelscited by 90
  15. 2022GLUE-X: Evaluating Natural Language Understanding Models from an Out-of-distribution Generalization Perspectivecited by 72
  16. 2015LCSTS: A Large Scale Chinese Short Text Summarization Datasetcited by 65
  17. 2024KIEval: A Knowledge-grounded Interactive Evaluation Framework for Large Language Modelscited by 36
  18. 2023Exploring Vision-Language Models for Imbalanced Learningcited by 35
  19. 2023Supervised Knowledge Makes Large Language Models Better In-context Learnerscited by 20
  20. 2024FreeEval: A Modular Framework for Trustworthy and Efficient Evaluation of Large Language Modelscited by 7
  21. 2024CodeShell Technical Reportcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 13 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025PRO: Enabling Precise and Robust Text Watermark for Open-Source LLMs
  2. 2024Less is More: Sparse Watermarking in LLMs with Enhanced Text Quality
  3. 2025DERMARK: A Dynamic, Efficient and Robust Multi-bit Watermark for Large Language Models
  4. 2024Theoretically Grounded Framework for LLM Watermarking: A Distribution-Adaptive Approach
  5. 2025Is Multilingual LLM Watermarking Truly Multilingual? Scaling Robustness to 100+ Languages via Back-Translation
  6. 2025Entropy-Guided Watermarking for LLMs: A Test-Time Framework for Robust and Traceable Text Generation
  7. 2024A Statistical Framework of Watermarks for Large Language Models: Pivot, Detection Efficiency and Optimal Rules
  8. 2026MirrorMark: Generalizable Mirrored Sampling for Multi-bit LLM Watermarking