mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Vanishing Variance Problem in Fully Decentralized Neural-Network Systems

arXiv 2404.04616 ↗First posted 6 Apr 2024cs.LG cs.DCcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Federated learning and gossip learning are emerging methodologies designed to mitigate data privacy concerns by retaining training data on client devices and exclusively sharing locally-trained machine learning (ML) models with others. The primary distinction between the two lies in their approach to model aggregation: federated learning employs a centralized parameter server, whereas gossip learning adopts a fully decentralized mechanism, enabling direct model exchanges among nodes. This decentralized nature often positions gossip learning as less efficient compared to federated learning. Both methodologies involve a critical step: computing a representation of received ML models and integrating this representation into the existing model. Conventionally, this representation is derived by averaging the received models, exemplified by the FedAVG algorithm. Our findings suggest that this averaging approach inherently introduces a potential delay in model convergence. We identify the underlying cause and refer to it as the "vanishing variance" problem, where averaging across uncorrelated ML models undermines the optimal variance established by the Xavier weight initialization. Unlike federated learning where the central server ensures model correlation, and unlike traditional gossip learning which circumvents this problem through model partitioning and sampling, our research introduces a variance-corrected model averaging algorithm. This novel algorithm preserves the optimal variance needed during model averaging, irrespective of network topology or non-IID data distributions. Our extensive simulation results demonstrate that our approach enables gossip learning to achieve convergence efficiency comparable to that of federated learning.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Apr 2024.

Builds on

11 of 22 references.

References · 11

  1. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
  2. 2018How To Backdoor Federated Learningcited by 745
  3. 2019Local Model Poisoning Attacks to Byzantine-Robust Federated Learningcited by 479
  4. 2019Robust and Communication-Efficient Federated Learning from Non-IID Datacited by 415
  5. 2021FedKD: Communication Efficient Federated Learning via Knowledge Distillationcited by 185
  6. 2021Accelerating Gossip SGD with Periodic Global Averagingcited by 25
  7. 2020An Overview of Federated Deep Learning Privacy Attacks and Defensive Strategiescited by 18
  8. 2021Fidel: Reconstructing Private Training Samples from Weight Updates in Federated Learningcited by 7
  9. 2022Online Model Compression for Federated Learning with Large Modelscited by 7
  10. 2022DR-DSGD: A Distributionally Robust Decentralized Learning Algorithm over Graphscited by 5
  11. 2021DFL: High-Performance Blockchain-Based Federated Learningcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

3 papers.