mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Fidel: Reconstructing Private Training Samples from Weight Updates in Federated Learning

arXiv 2101.00159 ↗First posted 1 Jan 2021cs.LGcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

With the increasing number of data collectors such as smartphones, immense amounts of data are available. Federated learning was developed to allow for distributed learning on a massive scale whilst still protecting each users' privacy. This privacy is claimed by the notion that the centralized server does not have any access to a client's data, solely the client's model update. In this paper, we evaluate a novel attack method within regular federated learning which we name the First Dense Layer Attack (Fidel). The methodology of using this attack is discussed, and as a proof of viability we show how this attack method can be used to great effect for densely connected networks and convolutional neural networks. We evaluate some key design decisions and show that the usage of ReLu and Dropout are detrimental to the privacy of a client's local dataset. We show how to recover on average twenty out of thirty private data samples from a client's model update employing a fully connected neural network with very little computational resources required. Similarly, we show that over thirteen out of twenty samples can be recovered from a convolutional neural network update. An open source implementation of this attack can be found here https://github.com/Davidenthoven/Fidel-Reconstruction-Demo

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jan 2021.

Builds on

16 of 31 references.

References · 16

  1. 2017BadNets: Identifying Vulnerabilities in the Machine Learning Model Supply Chaincited by 1,052
  2. 2017Targeted Backdoor Attacks on Deep Learning Systems Using Data Poisoningcited by 1,012
  3. 2019Deep Leakage from Gradientscited by 1,004
  4. 2018How To Backdoor Federated Learningcited by 745
  5. 2018Federated Learning for Mobile Keyboard Predictioncited by 565
  6. 2020iDLG: Improved Deep Leakage from Gradientscited by 367
  7. 2017Deep Models Under the GAN: Information Leakage from Collaborative Deep Learningcited by 326
  8. 2018Beyond Inferring Class Representatives: User-Level Privacy Leakage From Federated Learningcited by 242
  9. 2018Applied Federated Learning: Improving Google Keyboard Query Suggestionscited by 202
  10. 2020Threats to Federated Learning: A Surveycited by 171
  11. 2018Mitigating Sybils in Federated Learning Poisoningcited by 158
  12. 2018Multi-Institutional Deep Learning Modeling Without Sharing Patient Data: A Feasibility Study on Brain Tumor Segmentationcited by 148
4 more
  1. 2019Federated Learning for Emoji Prediction in a Mobile Keyboardcited by 115
  2. 2019Patient Clustering Improves Efficiency of Federated Machine Learning to predict mortality and hospital stay time using distributed Electronic Medical Recordscited by 70
  3. 2020An Overview of Federated Deep Learning Privacy Attacks and Defensive Strategiescited by 18
  4. 2020Privacy-Preserving Object Detection & Localization Using Distributed Machine Learning: A Case Study of Infant Eyeblink Conditioningcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 2.

7 papers.