Half-Space Feature Learning in Neural Networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
There currently exist two extreme viewpoints for neural network feature learning -- (i) Neural networks simply implement a kernel method (a la NTK) and hence no features are learned (ii) Neural networks can represent (and hence learn) intricate hierarchical features suitable for the data. We argue in this paper neither interpretation is likely to be correct based on a novel viewpoint. Neural networks can be viewed as a mixture of experts, where each expert corresponds to a (number of layers length) path through a sequence of hidden units. We use this alternate interpretation to motivate a model, called the Deep Linearly Gated Network (DLGN), which sits midway between deep linear networks and ReLU networks. Unlike deep linear networks, the DLGN is capable of learning non-linear features (which are then linearly combined), and unlike ReLU networks these features are ultimately simple -- each feature is effectively an indicator function for a region compactly described as an intersection of (number of layers) half-spaces in the input space. This viewpoint allows for a comprehensive global visualization of features, unlike the local visualizations for neurons based on saliency/activation/gradient maps. Feature learning in DLGNs is shown to happen and the mechanism with which this happens is through learning half-spaces in the input space that contain smooth regions of the target function. Due to the structure of DLGNs, the neurons in later layers are fundamentally the same as those in earlier layers -- they all represent a half-space -- however, the dynamics of gradient descent impart a distinct clustering to the later layer neurons. We hypothesize that ReLU networks also have similar feature learning behaviour.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Apr 2024.
Builds on
14 of 17 references.
References · 14
- 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
- 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,597
- 2014On the Number of Linear Regions of Deep Neural Networkscited by 378
- 2016Benefits of depth in neural networkscited by 248
- 2020Deep learning versus kernel learning: an empirical study of loss landscape geometry and the time evolution of the Neural Tangent Kernelcited by 185
- 2019Complexity of Linear Regions in Deep Networkscited by 166
- 2022Neural Networks can Learn Representations with Gradient Descentcited by 161
- 2019Deep ReLU Networks Have Surprisingly Few Activation Patternscited by 160
- 2019The Convergence Rate of Neural Networks for Learned Functions of Different Frequenciescited by 134
- 2021Neural Networks as Kernel Learners: The Silent Alignment Effectcited by 106
- 2017Failures of Gradient-Based Deep Learningcited by 79
- 2020Learning Parities with Neural Networkscited by 77
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Feature Space Analysis by Guided Diffusion Model
- 2026Traversing the solution space of neural networks with Hessian Null Space Continuation
- 2022Graph-based Neural Modules to Inspect Attention-based Architectures: A Position Paper
- 2025Characterising the Inductive Biases of Neural Networks on Boolean Data
- 2025Human-aligned Deep Learning: Explainability, Causality, and Biological Inspiration
- 2024A Decade of Deep Learning: A Survey on The Magnificent Seven
- 2025VITAL: More Understandable Feature Visualization through Distribution Alignment and Relevant Information Flow
- 2019SWNet: Small-World Neural Networks and Rapid Convergence ↗