mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

On the Theoretical Expressive Power and the Design Space of Higher-Order Graph Transformers

arXiv 2404.03380 ↗First posted 4 Apr 2024cs.LG cs.CG math.GNcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Graph transformers have recently received significant attention in graph learning, partly due to their ability to capture more global interaction via self-attention. Nevertheless, while higher-order graph neural networks have been reasonably well studied, the exploration of extending graph transformers to higher-order variants is just starting. Both theoretical understanding and empirical results are limited. In this paper, we provide a systematic study of the theoretical expressive power of order-k graph transformers and sparse variants. We first show that, an order-k graph transformer without additional structural information is less expressive than the k-Weisfeiler Lehman (k-WL) test despite its high computational cost. We then explore strategies to both sparsify and enhance the higher-order graph transformers, aiming to improve both their efficiency and expressiveness. Indeed, sparsification based on neighborhood information can enhance the expressive power, as it provides additional information about input graph structures. In particular, we show that a natural neighborhood-based sparse order-k transformer model is not only computationally efficient, but also expressive -- as expressive as k-WL test. We further study several other sparse graph attention models that are computationally efficient and provide their expressiveness analysis. Finally, we provide experimental results to show the effectiveness of the different sparsification strategies.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 51 of its 68 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Apr 2024.

Builds on

51 of 68 references.

References · 51

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,282
  4. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,854
  5. 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,355
  6. 2020Longformer: The Long-Document Transformercited by 3,362
  7. 2020Open Graph Benchmark: Datasets for Machine Learning on Graphscited by 2,148
  8. 2020Transformers are RNNs: Fast Autoregressive Transformers with Linear Attentioncited by 1,979
  9. 2020Big Bird: Transformers for Longer Sequencescited by 1,673
  10. 2020Reformer: The Efficient Transformercited by 1,658
  11. 2020Rethinking Attention with Performerscited by 1,584
  12. 2020Linformer: Self-Attention with Linear Complexitycited by 1,462
38 more
  1. 2017Deep Setscited by 1,394
  2. 2022Recipe for a General, Powerful, Scalable Graph Transformercited by 702
  3. 2020Benchmarking Graph Neural Networkscited by 672
  4. 2020Principal Neighbourhood Aggregation for Graph Netscited by 477
  5. 2020Efficient Content-Based Sparse Attention with Routing Transformerscited by 469
  6. 2021Rethinking Graph Transformers with Spectral Attentioncited by 468
  7. 2019Provably Powerful Graph Networkscited by 385
  8. 2017Residual Gated Graph ConvNetscited by 341
  9. 2018Invariant and Equivariant Graph Networkscited by 339
  10. 2021Graph Neural Networks with Learnable Structural and Positional Representationscited by 326
  11. 2021Do Transformers Really Perform Bad for Graph Representation?cited by 318
  12. 2020Improving Graph Neural Network Expressivity via Subgraph Isomorphism Countingcited by 312
  13. 2022Long Range Graph Benchmarkcited by 258
  14. 2020Can Graph Neural Networks Count Substructures?cited by 235
  15. 2021Weisfeiler and Lehman Go Cellular: CW Networkscited by 218
  16. 2022Pure Transformers are Powerful Graph Learnerscited by 188
  17. 2022Sign and Basis Invariant Networks for Spectral Graph Representation Learningcited by 176
  18. 2023Exphormer: Sparse Transformers for Graphscited by 166
  19. 2019Adaptively Sparse Transformerscited by 154
  20. 2021From Stars to Subgraphs: Uplifting Any GNN with Local Structure Awarenesscited by 154
  21. 2023Graph Inductive Biases in Transformers without Message Passingcited by 150
  22. 2020Directional Graph Networkscited by 132
  23. 2023Representational Strengths and Limitations of Transformerscited by 132
  24. 2021Global Self-Attention as a Replacement for Graph Convolutioncited by 113
  25. 2020Simplicial Neural Networkscited by 105
  26. 2020Expressive Power of Invariant and Equivariant Graph Neural Networkscited by 100
  27. 2023Attending to Graph Transformerscited by 81
  28. 2023On the Connection Between MPNN and Graph Transformercited by 60
  29. 2019HodgeNet: Graph Neural Networks for Edge Datacited by 39
  30. 2019Alchemy: A Quantum Chemistry Dataset for Benchmarking AI Modelscited by 36
  31. 2021Transformers Generalize DeepSets and Can be Extended to Graphs and Hypergraphscited by 35
  32. 2020The expressive power of kth-order invariant graph networkscited by 34
  33. 2023Sumformer: Universal Approximation for Efficient Transformerscited by 30
  34. 2023Convolutional Learning on Simplicial Complexescited by 26
  35. 2022Simplicial Attention Neural Networkscited by 21
  36. 2023Laplacian Canonization: A Minimalist Approach to Sign and Basis Invariant Spectral Embeddingcited by 21
  37. 2023From Relational Pooling to Subgraph GNNs: A Universal Framework for More Expressive Graph Neural Networkscited by 17
  38. 2023Facilitating Graph Neural Networks with Random Walk on Simplicial Complexescited by 14

50 most cited of 51 All 51 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 1; 2026: 3.

8 papers.