mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Pairwise Similarity Distribution Clustering for Noisy Label Learning

arXiv 2404.01853 ↗First posted 2 Apr 2024cs.LG cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Noisy label learning aims to train deep neural networks using a large amount of samples with noisy labels, whose main challenge comes from how to deal with the inaccurate supervision caused by wrong labels. Existing works either take the label correction or sample selection paradigm to involve more samples with accurate labels into the training process. In this paper, we propose a simple yet effective sample selection algorithm, termed as Pairwise Similarity Distribution Clustering~(PSDC), to divide the training samples into one clean set and another noisy set, which can power any of the off-the-shelf semi-supervised learning regimes to further train networks for different downstream tasks. Specifically, we take the pairwise similarity between sample pairs to represent the sample structure, and the Gaussian Mixture Model~(GMM) to model the similarity distribution between sample pairs belonging to the same noisy cluster, therefore each sample can be confidently divided into the clean set or noisy set. Even under severe label noise rate, the resulting data partition mechanism has been proved to be more robust in judging the label confidence in both theory and practice. Experimental results on various benchmark datasets, such as CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100 and Clothing1M, demonstrate significant improvements over state-of-the-art methods.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Apr 2024.

Builds on

24 of 41 references.

References · 24

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
  3. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
  4. 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,053
  5. 2017A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networkscited by 936
  6. 2018AutoAugment: Learning Augmentation Policies from Datacited by 728
  7. 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 691
  8. 2018Learning to Reweight Examples for Robust Deep Learningcited by 670
  9. 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 663
  10. 2017Robust Loss Functions under Label Noise for Deep Neural Networkscited by 441
  11. 2019How does Disagreement Help Generalization against Label Corruption?cited by 390
  12. 2019Unsupervised Label Noise Modeling and Loss Correctioncited by 327
12 more
  1. 2014Training Deep Neural Networks on Noisy Labels with Bootstrappingcited by 322
  2. 2018Joint Optimization Framework for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 293
  3. 2018Using Trusted Data to Train Deep Networks on Labels Corrupted by Severe Noisecited by 216
  4. 2019Probabilistic End-to-end Noise Correction for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 210
  5. 2019Meta Label Correction for Noisy Label Learningcited by 108
  6. 2020Multi-Objective Interpolation Training for Robustness to Label Noisecited by 86
  7. 2020Beyond Class-Conditional Assumption: A Primary Attempt to Combat Instance-Dependent Label Noisecited by 82
  8. 2020Learning to Purify Noisy Labels via Meta Soft Label Correctorcited by 39
  9. 2021Towards Understanding Deep Learning from Noisy Labels with Small-Loss Criterioncited by 36
  10. 2020ProSelfLC: Progressive Self Label Correction for Training Robust Deep Neural Networkscited by 33
  11. 2019L_DMI: An Information-theoretic Noise-robust Loss Functioncited by 26
  12. 2021Combating Noise: Semi-supervised Learning by Region Uncertainty Quantificationcited by 18

Built on by

Not cited yet.