mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The Fine Line: Navigating Large Language Model Pretraining with Down-streaming Capability Analysis

arXiv 2404.01204 ↗First posted 1 Apr 2024cs.CLcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Uncovering early-stage metrics that reflect final model performance is one core principle for large-scale pretraining. The existing scaling law demonstrates the power-law correlation between pretraining loss and training flops, which serves as an important indicator of the current training state for large language models. However, this principle only focuses on the model's compression properties on the training data, resulting in an inconsistency with the ability improvements on the downstream tasks. Some follow-up works attempted to extend the scaling-law to more complex metrics (such as hyperparameters), but still lacked a comprehensive analysis of the dynamic differences among various capabilities during pretraining. To address the aforementioned limitations, this paper undertakes a comprehensive comparison of model capabilities at various pretraining intermediate checkpoints. Through this analysis, we confirm that specific downstream metrics exhibit similar training dynamics across models of different sizes, up to 67 billion parameters. In addition to our core findings, we've reproduced Amber and OpenLLaMA, releasing their intermediate checkpoints. This initiative offers valuable resources to the research community and facilitates the verification and exploration of LLM pretraining by open-source researchers. Besides, we provide empirical summaries, including performance comparisons of different models and capabilities, and tuition of key metrics for different training phases. Based on these findings, we provide a more user-friendly strategy for evaluating the optimization state, offering guidance for establishing a stable pretraining process.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Apr 2024.

Builds on

25 of 38 references.

References · 25

  1. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  2. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
  3. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
  4. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
  5. 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,710
  6. 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,018
  7. 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,509
  8. 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 2,927
  9. 2017TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehensioncited by 2,895
  10. 2019PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural Languagecited by 2,818
  11. 2022Emergent Abilities of Large Language Modelscited by 2,483
  12. 2019BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questionscited by 2,140
13 more
  1. 2018Can a Suit of Armor Conduct Electricity? A New Dataset for Open Book Question Answeringcited by 2,114
  2. 2019Megatron-LM: Training Multi-Billion Parameter Language Models Using Model Parallelismcited by 1,829
  3. 2018CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledgecited by 1,793
  4. 2018Know What You Don't Know: Unanswerable Questions for SQuADcited by 1,538
  5. 2024Yi: Open Foundation Models by 01.AIcited by 706
  6. 2023C-Eval: A Multi-Level Multi-Discipline Chinese Evaluation Suite for Foundation Modelscited by 694
  7. 2019Deep Double Descent: Where Bigger Models and More Data Hurtcited by 667
  8. 2024DeepSeek LLM: Scaling Open-Source Language Models with Longtermismcited by 621
  9. 2020Scaling Laws for Autoregressive Generative Modelingcited by 510
  10. 2023Scaling Data-Constrained Language Modelscited by 391
  11. 2021Scaling Laws for Transfercited by 265
  12. 2023TheoremQA: A Theorem-driven Question Answering datasetcited by 189
  13. 2023Grokking of Hierarchical Structure in Vanilla Transformerscited by 53

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

4 papers.