Efficient Motion Planning for Manipulators with Control Barrier Function-Induced Neural Controller
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Sampling-based motion planning methods for manipulators in crowded environments often suffer from expensive collision checking and high sampling complexity, which make them difficult to use in real time. To address this issue, we propose a new generalizable control barrier function (CBF)-based steering controller to reduce the number of samples needed in a sampling-based motion planner RRT. Our method combines the strength of CBF for real-time collision-avoidance control and RRT for long-horizon motion planning, by using CBF-induced neural controller (CBF-INC) to generate control signals that steer the system towards sampled configurations by RRT. CBF-INC is learned as Neural Networks and has two variants handling different inputs, respectively: state (signed distance) input and point-cloud input from LiDAR. In the latter case, we also study two different settings: fully and partially observed environmental information. Compared to manually crafted CBF which suffers from over-approximating robot geometry, CBF-INC can balance safety and goal-reaching better without being over-conservative. Given state-based input, our neural CBF-induced neural controller-enhanced RRT (CBF-INC-RRT) can increase the success rate by 14% while reducing the number of nodes explored by 30%, compared with vanilla RRT on hard test cases. Given LiDAR input where vanilla RRT is not directly applicable, we demonstrate that our CBF-INC-RRT can improve the success rate by 10%, compared with planning with other steering controllers. Our project page with supplementary material is at https://mit-realm.github.io/CBF-INC-RRT-website/.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Apr 2024.
Builds on
30 of 55 references.
References · 30
- 2016PointNet: Deep Learning on Point Sets for 3D Classification and Segmentationcited by 5,223
- 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,279
- 2018Behavioral Cloning from Observationcited by 482
- 2016Control Barrier Function Based Quadratic Programs for Safety Critical Systemscited by 261
- 2017Learning Sampling Distributions for Robot Motion Planningcited by 79
- 2018Motion Planning Networkscited by 78
- 2021Learning Safe Multi-Agent Control with Decentralized Neural Barrier Certificatescited by 71
- 2017OptLayer - Practical Constrained Optimization for Deep Reinforcement Learning in the Real Worldcited by 64
- 2020Learning Certified Control using Contraction Metriccited by 48
- 2016From Perception to Decision: A Data-driven Approach to End-to-end Motion Planning for Autonomous Ground Robotscited by 37
- 2013Fast Marching Tree: a Fast Marching Sampling-Based Method for Optimal Motion Planning in Many Dimensionscited by 25
- 2022Learning Safe, Generalizable Perception-based Hybrid Control with Certificatescited by 24
18 more
- 2019Robust Guarantees for Perception-Based Controlcited by 20
- 2019Harnessing Reinforcement Learning for Neural Motion Planningcited by 19
- 2019Learned Critical Probabilistic Roadmaps for Robotic Motion Planningcited by 18
- 2018Learning Implicit Sampling Distributions for Motion Planningcited by 16
- 2022Reducing Collision Checking for Sampling-Based Motion Planning Using Graph Neural Networkscited by 16
- 2022Safe Reinforcement Learning of Dynamic High-Dimensional Robotic Tasks: Navigation, Manipulation, Interactioncited by 15
- 2020Learning Obstacle Representations for Neural Motion Planningcited by 13
- 2020Gaussian Process-based Min-norm Stabilizing Controller for Control-Affine Systems with Uncertain Input Effects and Dynamicscited by 12
- 2022Safety-Critical Manipulation for Collision-Free Food Preparationcited by 8
- 2020Safety-Critical Kinematic Control of Robotic Systemscited by 7
- 2020Reachable Sets for Safe, Real-Time Manipulator Trajectory Designcited by 6
- 2022Learning-based Motion Planning in Dynamic Environments Using GNNs and Temporal Encodingcited by 5
- 2023Safe Navigation and Obstacle Avoidance Using Differentiable Optimization Based Control Barrier Functionscited by 4
- 2020Safe and Robust Motion Planning for Dynamic Robotics via Control Barrier Functionscited by 3
- 2019Sampling-based Motion Planning via Control Barrier Functionscited by 2
- 2020NEO: A Novel Expeditious Optimisation Algorithm for Reactive Motion Control of Manipulatorscited by 2
- 2022Reinforcement Learning-Enhanced Control Barrier Functions for Robot Manipulatorscited by 2
- 2022Adaptive Sampling-based Motion Planning with Control Barrier Functionscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 3.
5 papers.
- 2026What Breaks Embodied AI Security:LLM Vulnerabilities, CPS Flaws,or Something Else?cited by 5
- 2025Neural Configuration-Space Barriers for Manipulation Planning and Controlcited by 3
- 2026Any-Body Guard: Universal Safeguarding for Manipulation Policies via Action Maskingcited by 2
- 2025Demonstrating ViSafe: Vision-enabled Safety for High-speed Detect and Avoidcited by 1
- 2026Toward Generalist Neural Motion Planners for Robotic Manipulators: Challenges and Opportunitiescited by 1
- 2026Any-Body Guard: Universal Safeguarding for Manipulation Policies via Action Masking21 Jun 2026
- 2026Toward Generalist Neural Motion Planners for Robotic Manipulators: Challenges and Opportunities25 Mar 2026
- 2026What Breaks Embodied AI Security:LLM Vulnerabilities, CPS Flaws,or Something Else?19 Feb 2026
- 2025Demonstrating ViSafe: Vision-enabled Safety for High-speed Detect and Avoid6 May 2025
- 2025Neural Configuration-Space Barriers for Manipulation Planning and Control6 Mar 2025