mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Green AI: Exploring Carbon Footprints, Mitigation Strategies, and Trade Offs in Large Language Model Training

arXiv 2404.01157 ↗First posted 1 Apr 2024cs.CL cs.PFcited by 15

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Prominent works in the field of Natural Language Processing have long attempted to create new innovative models by improving upon previous model training approaches, altering model architecture, and developing more in-depth datasets to better their performance. However, with the quickly advancing field of NLP comes increased greenhouse gas emissions, posing concerns over the environmental damage caused by training LLMs. Gaining a comprehensive understanding of the various costs, particularly those pertaining to environmental aspects, that are associated with artificial intelligence serves as the foundational basis for ensuring safe AI models. Currently, investigations into the CO2 emissions of AI models remain an emerging area of research, and as such, in this paper, we evaluate the CO2 emissions of well-known large language models, which have an especially high carbon footprint due to their significant amount of model parameters. We argue for the training of LLMs in a way that is responsible and sustainable by suggesting measures for reducing carbon emissions. Furthermore, we discuss how the choice of hardware affects CO2 emissions by contrasting the CO2 emissions during model training for two widely used GPUs. Based on our results, we present the benefits and drawbacks of our proposed solutions and make the argument for the possibility of training more environmentally safe AI models without sacrificing their robustness and performance.

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Apr 2024.

Builds on

18 of 25 references.

References · 18

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  4. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  5. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  6. 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,243
  7. 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,115
  8. 2019ALBERT: A Lite BERT for Self-supervised Learning of Language Representationscited by 2,772
  9. 2019Transformer-XL: Attentive Language Models Beyond a Fixed-Length Contextcited by 1,830
  10. 2019What Does BERT Look At? An Analysis of BERT's Attentioncited by 994
  11. 2019Green AIcited by 620
  12. 2019Quantifying the Carbon Emissions of Machine Learningcited by 516
6 more
  1. 2020Pretrained Transformers for Text Ranking: BERT and Beyondcited by 266
  2. 2020Beat the AI: Investigating Adversarial Human Annotation for Reading Comprehensioncited by 131
  3. 2022Eco2AI: carbon emissions tracking of machine learning models as the first step towards sustainable AIcited by 58
  4. 2023Counting Carbon: A Survey of Factors Influencing the Emissions of Machine Learningcited by 42
  5. 2023ChatGPT for Shaping the Future of Dentistry: The Potential of Multi-Modal Large Language Modelcited by 40
  6. 2020Chatbot Interaction with Artificial Intelligence: Human Data Augmentation with T5 and Language Transformer Ensemble for Text Classificationcited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 8; 2026: 6.

15 papers.

Sort:

By area: