mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Adding simple structure at inference improves Vision-Language Compositionality

arXiv 2506.09691 ↗First posted 11 Jun 2025cs.CV cs.CL cs.LGcited by 1

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP

Abstract (arXiv)

Dual encoder Vision-Language Models (VLM) such as CLIP are widely used for image-text retrieval tasks. However, those models struggle with compositionality, showing a bag-of-words-like behavior that limits their retrieval performance. Many different training approaches have been proposed to improve the vision-language compositionality capabilities of those models. In comparison, inference-time techniques have received little attention. In this paper, we propose to add simple structure at inference, where, given an image and a caption: i) we divide the image into different smaller crops, ii) we extract text segments, capturing objects, attributes and relations, iii) using a VLM, we find the image crops that better align with text segments obtaining matches, and iv) we compute the final image-text similarity aggregating the individual similarities of the matches. Based on various popular dual encoder VLMs, we evaluate our approach in controlled and natural datasets for VL compositionality. We find that our approach consistently improves the performance of evaluated VLMs without any training, which shows the potential of inference-time techniques. The results are especially good for attribute-object binding as shown in the controlled dataset. As a result of an extensive analysis: i) we show that processing image crops is actually essential for the observed gains in performance, and ii) we identify specific areas to further improve inference-time approaches.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 27 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jun 2025.

Builds on

27 of 31 references.

Closest ancestors · 5

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023Enhancing Multimodal Compositional Reasoning of Visual Language Models with Generative Negative Mining7 Nov
  2. 2023SugarCrepe: Fixing Hackable Benchmarks for Vision-Language Compositionality26 Jun
  3. 2022CREPE: Can Vision-Language Foundation Models Reason Compositionally?13 Dec
  4. 2022When and why vision-language models behave like bags-of-words, and what to do about it?4 Oct
  5. 2022PyramidCLIP: Hierarchical Feature Alignment for Vision-language Model Pretraining29 Apr

Other references · 22

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  2. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
  3. 2015Fast R-CNNcited by 2,933
  4. 2016CLEVR: A Diagnostic Dataset for Compositional Language and Elementary Visual Reasoningcited by 1,457
  5. 2025SigLIP 2: Multilingual Vision-Language Encoders with Improved Semantic Understanding, Localization, and Dense Featurescited by 1,188
  6. 2021FILIP: Fine-grained Interactive Language-Image Pre-Trainingcited by 627
  7. 2022Winoground: Probing Vision and Language Models for Visio-Linguistic Compositionalitycited by 529
  8. 2024Evaluating Text-to-Visual Generation with Image-to-Text Generationcited by 474
  9. 2023TIFA: Accurate and Interpretable Text-to-Image Faithfulness Evaluation with Question Answeringcited by 428
  10. 2021Multi-Grained Vision Language Pre-Training: Aligning Texts with Visual Conceptscited by 256
  11. 2020On the Binding Problem in Artificial Neural Networkscited by 233
  12. 2023Davidsonian Scene Graph: Improving Reliability in Fine-grained Evaluation for Text-to-Image Generationcited by 171
10 more
  1. 2022Does CLIP Bind Concepts? Probing Compositionality in Large Image Modelscited by 102
  2. 2024Understanding the Limits of Vision Language Models Through the Lens of the Binding Problemcited by 75
  3. 2024TripletCLIP: Improving Compositional Reasoning of CLIP via Synthetic Vision-Language Negativescited by 58
  4. 2022Image-text Retrieval: A Survey on Recent Research and Developmentcited by 55
  5. 2023Equivariant Similarity for Vision-Language Foundation Modelscited by 52
  6. 2023Revisiting the Role of Language Priors in Vision-Language Modelscited by 50
  7. 2022Why is Winoground Hard? Investigating Failures in Visuolinguistic Compositionalitycited by 44
  8. 2024Revisiting Text-to-Image Evaluation with Gecko: On Metrics, Prompts, and Human Ratingscited by 44
  9. 2024Natural Language Inference Improves Compositionality in Vision-Language Modelscited by 8
  10. 2024BiVLC: Extending Vision-Language Compositionality Evaluation with Text-to-Image Retrievalcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2023Text encoders bottleneck compositionality in contrastive vision-language models
  2. 2026Inference-Time Structural Reasoning for Compositional Vision-Language Understanding
  3. 2026Revisiting Compositionality in Dual-Encoder Vision-Language Models: The Role of Inference
  4. 2025Vision-Free Retrieval: Rethinking Multimodal Search with Textual Scene Descriptions
  5. 2024Exploring How Generative MLLMs Perceive More Than CLIP with the Same Vision Encoder
  6. 2024MMCOMPOSITION: Revisiting the Compositionality of Pre-trained Vision-Language Models
  7. 2024Adapting Dual-encoder Vision-language Models for Paraphrased Retrieval
  8. 2025Compositional Image-Text Matching and Retrieval by Grounding Entities