mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Intrinsic Subgraph Generation for Interpretable Graph based Visual Question Answering

arXiv 2403.17647 ↗First posted 26 Mar 2024cs.CLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The large success of deep learning based methods in Visual Question Answering (VQA) has concurrently increased the demand for explainable methods. Most methods in Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) focus on generating post-hoc explanations rather than taking an intrinsic approach, the latter characterizing an interpretable model. In this work, we introduce an interpretable approach for graph-based VQA and demonstrate competitive performance on the GQA dataset. This approach bridges the gap between interpretability and performance. Our model is designed to intrinsically produce a subgraph during the question-answering process as its explanation, providing insight into the decision making. To evaluate the quality of these generated subgraphs, we compare them against established post-hoc explainability methods for graph neural networks, and perform a human evaluation. Moreover, we present quantitative metrics that correlate with the evaluations of human assessors, acting as automatic metrics for the generated explanatory subgraphs. Our implementation is available at https://github.com/DigitalPhonetics/Intrinsic-Subgraph-Generation-for-VQA.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Mar 2024.

Builds on

28 of 48 references.

References · 28

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  3. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,923
  4. 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,548
  5. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
  6. 2016Categorical Reparameterization with Gumbel-Softmaxcited by 2,739
  7. 2016Visual Genome: Connecting Language and Vision Using Crowdsourced Dense Image Annotationscited by 2,656
  8. 2015VQA: Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,506
  9. 2019Fast Graph Representation Learning with PyTorch Geometriccited by 2,434
  10. 2019Towards VQA Models That Can Readcited by 1,718
  11. 2016CLEVR: A Diagnostic Dataset for Compositional Language and Elementary Visual Reasoningcited by 1,457
  12. 2016The Concrete Distribution: A Continuous Relaxation of Discrete Random Variablescited by 1,148
16 more
  1. 2021How Attentive are Graph Attention Networks?cited by 835
  2. 2022A-OKVQA: A Benchmark for Visual Question Answering using World Knowledgecited by 710
  3. 2019Is Attention Interpretable?cited by 389
  4. 2017Don't Just Assume; Look and Answer: Overcoming Priors for Visual Question Answeringcited by 339
  5. 2020PGM-Explainer: Probabilistic Graphical Model Explanations for Graph Neural Networkscited by 211
  6. 2021Self-Supervised Learning of Graph Neural Networks: A Unified Reviewcited by 184
  7. 2020Ground Truth Evaluation of Neural Network Explanations with CLEVR-XAIcited by 126
  8. 2022A Comprehensive Survey on Trustworthy Graph Neural Networks: Privacy, Robustness, Fairness, and Explainabilitycited by 118
  9. 2019Learning by Abstraction: The Neural State Machinecited by 113
  10. 2021Implicit MLE: Backpropagating Through Discrete Exponential Family Distributionscited by 98
  11. 2015Where To Look: Focus Regions for Visual Question Answeringcited by 64
  12. 2020Interpretability and Explainability: A Machine Learning Zoo Mini-tourcited by 55
  13. 2021Zero-shot Visual Question Answering using Knowledge Graphcited by 37
  14. 2021GraghVQA: Language-Guided Graph Neural Networks for Graph-based Visual Question Answeringcited by 16
  15. 2021Graphhopper: Multi-Hop Scene Graph Reasoning for Visual Question Answeringcited by 13
  16. 2021Beyond Accuracy: A Consolidated Tool for Visual Question Answering Benchmarkingcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.