mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

An Experiment with the Use of ChatGPT for LCSH Subject Assignment on Electronic Theses and Dissertations

arXiv 2403.16424 ↗First posted 25 Mar 2024cs.AI cs.DL cs.IRcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This study delves into the potential use of large language models (LLMs) for generating Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH). The authors employed ChatGPT to generate subject headings for electronic theses and dissertations (ETDs) based on their titles and abstracts. The results suggests that LLMs such as ChatGPT have the potential to reduce cataloging time needed for assigning LCSH subject terms for ETDs as well as to improve the discovery of this type of resource in academic libraries. Nonetheless, human catalogers remain essential for verifying and enhancing the validity, exhaustivity, and specificity of LCSH generated by LLMs.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Mar 2024.

Builds on

6 of 19 references.

References · 6

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
  3. 2021Want To Reduce Labeling Cost? GPT-3 Can Helpcited by 196
  4. 2023ChatGPT-4 Outperforms Experts and Crowd Workers in Annotating Political Twitter Messages with Zero-Shot Learningcited by 100
  5. 2023Can ChatGPT Reproduce Human-Generated Labels? A Study of Social Computing Taskscited by 89
  6. 2023Utilising a Large Language Model to Annotate Subject Metadata: A Case Study in an Australian National Research Data Cataloguecited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

3 papers.