Utilising a Large Language Model to Annotate Subject Metadata: A Case Study in an Australian National Research Data Catalogue
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In support of open and reproducible research, there has been a rapidly increasing number of datasets made available for research. As the availability of datasets increases, it becomes more important to have quality metadata for discovering and reusing them. Yet, it is a common issue that datasets often lack quality metadata due to limited resources for data curation. Meanwhile, technologies such as artificial intelligence and large language models (LLMs) are progressing rapidly. Recently, systems based on these technologies, such as ChatGPT, have demonstrated promising capabilities for certain data curation tasks. This paper proposes to leverage LLMs for cost-effective annotation of subject metadata through the LLM-based in-context learning. Our method employs GPT-3.5 with prompts designed for annotating subject metadata, demonstrating promising performance in automatic metadata annotation. However, models based on in-context learning cannot acquire discipline-specific rules, resulting in lower performance in several categories. This limitation arises from the limited contextual information available for subject inference. To the best of our knowledge, we are introducing, for the first time, an in-context learning method that harnesses large language models for automated subject metadata annotation.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Oct 2023.
Builds on
16 of 23 references.
References · 16
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
- 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,375
- 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,915
- 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,780
- 2023Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4cited by 2,592
- 2021Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processingcited by 2,234
- 2021What Makes Good In-Context Examples for GPT-3?cited by 1,195
- 2019How Can We Know What Language Models Know?cited by 959
- 2023ChatGPT Outperforms Crowd-Workers for Text-Annotation Taskscited by 870
4 more
- 2023Can Large Language Models Be an Alternative to Human Evaluations?cited by 734
- 2022Unnatural Instructions: Tuning Language Models with (Almost) No Human Laborcited by 397
- 2021Want To Reduce Labeling Cost? GPT-3 Can Helpcited by 196
- 2023Artificial Artificial Artificial Intelligence: Crowd Workers Widely Use Large Language Models for Text Production Taskscited by 103
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 3.
4 papers.
- 2024An Experiment with the Use of ChatGPT for LCSH Subject Assignment on Electronic Theses and Dissertationscited by 3
- 2025DEUCE: Dual-diversity Enhancement and Uncertainty-awareness for Cold-start Active Learningcited by 2
- 2025Flexible metadata harvesting for ecology using large language modelscited by 1
- 2025A Hybrid Framework for Subject Analysis: Integrating Embedding-Based Regression Models with Large Language Modelscited by 0
- 2025Flexible metadata harvesting for ecology using large language models21 Aug 2025
- 2025A Hybrid Framework for Subject Analysis: Integrating Embedding-Based Regression Models with Large Language Models19 Jul 2025
- 2025DEUCE: Dual-diversity Enhancement and Uncertainty-awareness for Cold-start Active Learning1 Feb 2025
- 2024An Experiment with the Use of ChatGPT for LCSH Subject Assignment on Electronic Theses and Dissertations25 Mar 2024