Towards Low-Energy Adaptive Personalization for Resource-Constrained Devices
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The personalization of machine learning (ML) models to address data drift is a significant challenge in the context of Internet of Things (IoT) applications. Presently, most approaches focus on fine-tuning either the full base model or its last few layers to adapt to new data, while often neglecting energy costs. However, various types of data drift exist, and fine-tuning the full base model or the last few layers may not result in optimal performance in certain scenarios. We propose Target Block Fine-Tuning (TBFT), a low-energy adaptive personalization framework designed for resource-constrained devices. We categorize data drift and personalization into three types: input-level, feature-level, and output-level. For each type, we fine-tune different blocks of the model to achieve optimal performance with reduced energy costs. Specifically, input-, feature-, and output-level correspond to fine-tuning the front, middle, and rear blocks of the model. We evaluate TBFT on a ResNet model, three datasets, three different training sizes, and a Raspberry Pi. Compared with the Block Avg, where each block is fine-tuned individually and their performance improvements are averaged, TBFT exhibits an improvement in model accuracy by an average of 15.30% whilst saving 41.57% energy consumption on average compared with full fine-tuning.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Mar 2024.
Builds on
31 of 65 references.
References · 31
- 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,764
- 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,718
- 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
- 2021BitFit: Simple Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning for Transformer-based Masked Language-modelscited by 1,234
- 2021Robust fine-tuning of zero-shot modelscited by 785
- 2022Fine-Tuning can Distort Pretrained Features and Underperform Out-of-Distributioncited by 722
- 2020RobustBench: a standardized adversarial robustness benchmarkcited by 659
- 2021SWAD: Domain Generalization by Seeking Flat Minimacited by 431
- 2022Last Layer Re-Training is Sufficient for Robustness to Spurious Correlationscited by 379
- 2021MEMO: Test Time Robustness via Adaptation and Augmentationcited by 376
- 2020What is being transferred in transfer learning?cited by 365
- 2023A Comprehensive Survey on Test-Time Adaptation under Distribution Shiftscited by 353
19 more
- 2022Surgical Fine-Tuning Improves Adaptation to Distribution Shiftscited by 205
- 2021A Fine-Grained Analysis on Distribution Shiftcited by 171
- 2018SpotTune: Transfer Learning through Adaptive Fine-tuningcited by 166
- 2020Anatomy of Catastrophic Forgetting: Hidden Representations and Task Semanticscited by 158
- 2022On-Device Training Under 256KB Memorycited by 158
- 2020BREEDS: Benchmarks for Subpopulation Shiftcited by 155
- 2016Designing Energy-Efficient Convolutional Neural Networks using Energy-Aware Pruningcited by 133
- 2019What Would Elsa Do? Freezing Layers During Transformer Fine-Tuningcited by 87
- 2019Machine Learning at the Network Edge: A Surveycited by 83
- 2021The Evolution of Out-of-Distribution Robustness Throughout Fine-Tuningcited by 74
- 2022Domain-Adjusted Regression or: ERM May Already Learn Features Sufficient for Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 69
- 2019On-Device Machine Learning: An Algorithms and Learning Theory Perspectivecited by 63
- 2020In-N-Out: Pre-Training and Self-Training using Auxiliary Information for Out-of-Distribution Robustnesscited by 49
- 2021AutoFreeze: Automatically Freezing Model Blocks to Accelerate Fine-tuningcited by 48
- 2024Adaptive Ensembles of Fine-Tuned Transformers for LLM-Generated Text Detectioncited by 22
- 2022Towards Battery-Free Machine Learning and Inference in Underwater Environmentscited by 9
- 2020A Flexible Selection Scheme for Minimum-Effort Transfer Learningcited by 8
- 2024Low-Energy On-Device Personalization for MCUscited by 3
- 2023Towards Machine Learning and Inference for Resource-constrained MCUscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.