mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Cross-user activity recognition via temporal relation optimal transport

arXiv 2403.15423 ↗First posted 12 Mar 2024eess.SP cs.AI cs.CVcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Current research on human activity recognition (HAR) mainly assumes that training and testing data are drawn from the same distribution to achieve a generalised model, which means all the data are considered to be independent and identically distributed displaystyle (i.i.d.) . In many real-world applications, this assumption does not hold, and collected training and target testing datasets have non-uniform distribution, such as in the case of cross-user HAR. Domain adaptation is a promising approach for cross-user HAR tasks. Existing domain adaptation works based on the assumption that samples in each domain are displaystyle i.i.d. and do not consider the knowledge of temporal relation hidden in time series data for aligning data distribution. This strong assumption of displaystyle i.i.d. may not be suitable for time series-related domain adaptation methods because the samples formed by time series segmentation and feature extraction techniques are only coarse approximations to displaystyle i.i.d. assumption in each domain. In this paper, we propose the temporal relation optimal transport (TROT) method to utilise temporal relation and relax the displaystyle i.i.d. assumption for the samples in each domain for accurate and efficient knowledge transfer. We obtain the temporal relation representation and implement temporal relation alignment of activities via the Hidden Markov model (HMM) and optimal transport (OT) techniques. Besides, a new regularisation term that preserves temporal relation order information for an improved optimal transport mapping is proposed to enhance the domain adaptation performance. Comprehensive experiments are conducted on three public activity recognition datasets (i.e. OPPT, PAMAP2 and DSADS), demonstrating that TROT outperforms other state-of-the-art methods.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Mar 2024.

Builds on

12 of 40 references.

References · 12

  1. 2013Sinkhorn Distances: Lightspeed Computation of Optimal Transportation Distancescited by 2,277
  2. 2020Learning under Concept Drift: A Reviewcited by 470
  3. 2015Optimal Transport for Domain Adaptationcited by 457
  4. 2018A Survey on Deep Transfer Learningcited by 417
  5. 2015Return of Frustratingly Easy Domain Adaptationcited by 389
  6. 2018A Survey of Unsupervised Deep Domain Adaptationcited by 361
  7. 2020Deep Learning for Sensor-based Human Activity Recognition: Overview, Challenges and Opportunitiescited by 125
  8. 2017Stratified Transfer Learning for Cross-domain Activity Recognitioncited by 40
  9. 2019Cross-Subject Transfer Learning in Human Activity Recognition Systems using Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 35
  10. 2020Simultaneous Semantic Alignment Network for Heterogeneous Domain Adaptationcited by 21
  11. 2021Cross-domain Activity Recognition via Substructural Optimal Transportcited by 21
  12. 2018Cross-position Activity Recognition with Stratified Transfer Learningcited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 3.

5 papers.