Safeguarding Marketing Research: The Generation, Identification, and Mitigation of AI-Fabricated Disinformation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Generative AI has ushered in the ability to generate content that closely mimics human contributions, introducing an unprecedented threat: Deployed en masse, these models can be used to manipulate public opinion and distort perceptions, resulting in a decline in trust towards digital platforms. This study contributes to marketing literature and practice in three ways. First, it demonstrates the proficiency of AI in fabricating disinformative user-generated content (UGC) that mimics the form of authentic content. Second, it quantifies the disruptive impact of such UGC on marketing research, highlighting the susceptibility of analytics frameworks to even minimal levels of disinformation. Third, it proposes and evaluates advanced detection frameworks, revealing that standard techniques are insufficient for filtering out AI-generated disinformation. We advocate for a comprehensive approach to safeguarding marketing research that integrates advanced algorithmic solutions, enhanced human oversight, and a reevaluation of regulatory and ethical frameworks. Our study seeks to serve as a catalyst, providing a foundation for future research and policy-making aimed at navigating the intricate challenges at the nexus of technology, ethics, and marketing.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 70 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Mar 2024.
Builds on
14 of 70 references.
References · 14
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2018UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reductioncited by 2,898
- 2021Ethical and social risks of harm from Language Modelscited by 966
- 2022BERTopic: Neural topic modeling with a class-based TF-IDF procedurecited by 801
- 2019Defending Against Neural Fake Newscited by 559
- 2023How Close is ChatGPT to Human Experts? Comparison Corpus, Evaluation, and Detectioncited by 481
- 2017Fake News Detection on Social Media: A Data Mining Perspectivecited by 336
- 2023AI Deception: A Survey of Examples, Risks, and Potential Solutionscited by 188
- 2017Deep Learning for Hate Speech Detection in Tweetscited by 180
- 2017Automatic Detection of Fake Newscited by 145
- 2023The Science of Detecting LLM-Generated Textscited by 128
- 2023Deception Abilities Emerged in Large Language Modelscited by 101
Built on by
Not cited yet.