The AI Assessment Scale (AIAS) in action: A pilot implementation of GenAI supported assessment- A Preprint
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The rapid adoption of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) technologies in higher education has raised concerns about academic integrity, assessment practices, and student learning. Banning or blocking GenAI tools has proven ineffective, and punitive approaches ignore the potential benefits of these technologies. This paper presents the findings of a pilot study conducted at British University Vietnam (BUV) exploring the implementation of the Artificial Intelligence Assessment Scale (AIAS), a flexible framework for incorporating GenAI into educational assessments. The AIAS consists of five levels, ranging from 'No AI' to 'Full AI', enabling educators to design assessments that focus on areas requiring human input and critical thinking. Following the implementation of the AIAS, the pilot study results indicate a significant reduction in academic misconduct cases related to GenAI, a 5.9% increase in student attainment across the university, and a 33.3% increase in module passing rates. The AIAS facilitated a shift in pedagogical practices, with faculty members incorporating GenAI tools into their modules and students producing innovative multimodal submissions. The findings suggest that the AIAS can support the effective integration of GenAI in HE, promoting academic integrity while leveraging the technology's potential to enhance learning experiences. Refer to published version for final text.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Mar 2024.
Builds on
8 of 64 references.
References · 8
- 2023GPT detectors are biased against non-native English writerscited by 175
- 2023On the Possibilities of AI-Generated Text Detectioncited by 88
- 2023Testing of Detection Tools for AI-Generated Textcited by 86
- 2023ChatGPT is not all you need. A State of the Art Review of large Generative AI modelscited by 85
- 2023Practical and Ethical Challenges of Large Language Models in Education: A Systematic Scoping Reviewcited by 83
- 2023Students' Voices on Generative AI: Perceptions, Benefits, and Challenges in Higher Educationcited by 41
- 2023Smiling Women Pitching Down: Auditing Representational and Presentational Gender Biases in Image Generative AIcited by 19
- 2023Game of Tones: Faculty detection of GPT-4 generated content in university assessmentscited by 15
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
5 papers.
- 2024GenAI Detection Tools, Adversarial Techniques and Implications for Inclusivity in Higher Educationcited by 13
- 2024Understanding Student and Academic Staff Perceptions of AI Use in Assessment and Feedbackcited by 2
- 2024Generative AI and Agency in Education: A Critical Scoping Review and Thematic Analysiscited by 2
- 2024The EAP-AIAS: Adapting the AI Assessment Scale for English for Academic Purposescited by 0
- 2026LLMography: Transforming Human-AI Conversations into Traceability, Oversight, and Auditability Indicatorscited by 0
- 2026LLMography: Transforming Human-AI Conversations into Traceability, Oversight, and Auditability Indicators28 Jun 2026
- 2024Generative AI and Agency in Education: A Critical Scoping Review and Thematic Analysis1 Nov 2024
- 2024The EAP-AIAS: Adapting the AI Assessment Scale for English for Academic Purposes2 Aug 2024
- 2024Understanding Student and Academic Staff Perceptions of AI Use in Assessment and Feedback22 Jun 2024
- 2024GenAI Detection Tools, Adversarial Techniques and Implications for Inclusivity in Higher Education28 Mar 2024