Mapping LLM Security Landscapes: A Comprehensive Stakeholder Risk Assessment Proposal
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The rapid integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) across diverse sectors has marked a transformative era, showcasing remarkable capabilities in text generation and problem-solving tasks. However, this technological advancement is accompanied by significant risks and vulnerabilities. Despite ongoing security enhancements, attackers persistently exploit these weaknesses, casting doubts on the overall trustworthiness of LLMs. Compounding the issue, organisations are deploying LLM-integrated systems without understanding the severity of potential consequences. Existing studies by OWASP and MITRE offer a general overview of threats and vulnerabilities but lack a method for directly and succinctly analysing the risks for security practitioners, developers, and key decision-makers who are working with this novel technology. To address this gap, we propose a risk assessment process using tools like the OWASP risk rating methodology which is used for traditional systems. We conduct scenario analysis to identify potential threat agents and map the dependent system components against vulnerability factors. Through this analysis, we assess the likelihood of a cyberattack. Subsequently, we conduct a thorough impact analysis to derive a comprehensive threat matrix. We also map threats against three key stakeholder groups: developers engaged in model fine-tuning, application developers utilizing third-party APIs, and end users. The proposed threat matrix provides a holistic evaluation of LLM-related risks, enabling stakeholders to make informed decisions for effective mitigation strategies. Our outlined process serves as an actionable and comprehensive tool for security practitioners, offering insights for resource management and enhancing the overall system security.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Mar 2024.
Builds on
15 of 34 references.
References · 15
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,912
- 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,720
- 2023Mistral 7Bcited by 3,164
- 2023Siren's Song in the AI Ocean: A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Modelscited by 698
- 2023Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 639
- 2023Catastrophic Jailbreak of Open-source LLMs via Exploiting Generationcited by 451
- 2023Multi-step Jailbreaking Privacy Attacks on ChatGPTcited by 333
- 2023Fundamental Limitations of Alignment in Large Language Modelscited by 155
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 5; 2025: 1; 2026: 3.
9 papers.
- 2024When LLMs Meet Cybersecurity: A Systematic Literature Reviewcited by 71
- 2024Attack Atlas: A Practitioner's Perspective on Challenges and Pitfalls in Red Teaming GenAIcited by 16
- 2024A Survey on Human-Centric LLMscited by 13
- 2024How Privacy-Savvy Are Large Language Models? A Case Study on Compliance and Privacy Technical Reviewcited by 2
- 2025Securing Educational LLMs: A Generalised Taxonomy of Attacks on LLMs and DREAD Risk Assessmentcited by 2
- 2026Layered LLM Defenses as an Ensemble: Access Tiers, Inference Cost, and the Measured Failure Correlation Between Defense Layerscited by 2
- 2024A Simple Architecture for Enterprise Large Language Model Applications based on Role based security and Clearance Levels using Retrieval-Augmented Generation or Mixture of Expertscited by 0
- 2026Goal-Driven Risk Assessment for LLM-Powered Systems: A Healthcare Case Studycited by 0
- 2026Where Do LLM-based Systems Break? A System-Level Security Framework for Risk Assessment and Treatmentcited by 0
- 2026Layered LLM Defenses as an Ensemble: Access Tiers, Inference Cost, and the Measured Failure Correlation Between Defense Layers28 Aug 2026
- 2026Where Do LLM-based Systems Break? A System-Level Security Framework for Risk Assessment and Treatment8 Mar 2026
- 2026Goal-Driven Risk Assessment for LLM-Powered Systems: A Healthcare Case Study4 Mar 2026
- 2025Securing Educational LLMs: A Generalised Taxonomy of Attacks on LLMs and DREAD Risk Assessment12 Aug 2025
- 2024A Survey on Human-Centric LLMs20 Nov 2024
- 2024Attack Atlas: A Practitioner's Perspective on Challenges and Pitfalls in Red Teaming GenAI23 Sep 2024
- 2024How Privacy-Savvy Are Large Language Models? A Case Study on Compliance and Privacy Technical Review4 Sep 2024
- 2024A Simple Architecture for Enterprise Large Language Model Applications based on Role based security and Clearance Levels using Retrieval-Augmented Generation or Mixture of Experts9 Jul 2024
- 2024When LLMs Meet Cybersecurity: A Systematic Literature Review6 May 2024