Resilience in Online Federated Learning: Mitigating Model-Poisoning Attacks via Partial Sharing
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Federated learning (FL) allows training machine learning models on distributed data without compromising privacy. However, FL is vulnerable to model-poisoning attacks where malicious clients tamper with their local models to manipulate the global model. In this work, we investigate the resilience of the partial-sharing online FL (PSO-Fed) algorithm against such attacks. PSO-Fed reduces communication overhead by allowing clients to share only a fraction of their model updates with the server. We demonstrate that this partial sharing mechanism has the added advantage of enhancing PSO-Fed's robustness to model-poisoning attacks. Through theoretical analysis, we show that PSO-Fed maintains convergence even under Byzantine attacks, where malicious clients inject noise into their updates. Furthermore, we derive a formula for PSO-Fed's mean square error, considering factors like stepsize, attack probability, and the number of malicious clients. Interestingly, we find a non-trivial optimal stepsize that maximizes PSO-Fed's resistance to these attacks. Extensive numerical experiments confirm our theoretical findings and showcase PSO-Fed's superior performance against model-poisoning attacks compared to other leading FL algorithms.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Mar 2024.
Builds on
21 of 51 references.
References · 21
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
- 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,221
- 2018Byzantine-Robust Distributed Learning: Towards Optimal Statistical Ratescited by 698
- 2017Evasion Attacks against Machine Learning at Test Timecited by 686
- 2017Federated Multi-Task Learningcited by 669
- 2018signSGD: Compressed Optimisation for Non-Convex Problemscited by 561
- 2019Local Model Poisoning Attacks to Byzantine-Robust Federated Learningcited by 479
- 2020FLTrust: Byzantine-robust Federated Learning via Trust Bootstrappingcited by 330
- 2018The Hidden Vulnerability of Distributed Learning in Byzantiumcited by 324
- 2020FetchSGD: Communication-Efficient Federated Learning with Sketchingcited by 178
- 2022MPAF: Model Poisoning Attacks to Federated Learning based on Fake Clientscited by 65
- 2020Data Poisoning Attacks on Federated Machine Learningcited by 58
9 more
- 2022FedRecover: Recovering from Poisoning Attacks in Federated Learning using Historical Informationcited by 53
- 2019BRIDGE: Byzantine-resilient Decentralized Gradient Descentcited by 45
- 2017ByRDiE: Byzantine-resilient distributed coordinate descent for decentralized learningcited by 36
- 2020Stochastic-Sign SGD for Federated Learning with Theoretical Guaranteescited by 34
- 2021Communication-Efficient Online Federated Learning Framework for Nonlinear Regressioncited by 16
- 2021BROADCAST: Reducing Both Stochastic and Compression Noise to Robustify Communication-Efficient Federated Learningcited by 12
- 20211-Bit Compressive Sensing for Efficient Federated Learning Over the Aircited by 10
- 2015Consensus based Detection in the Presence of Data Falsification Attackscited by 5
- 2022Defense Strategies Toward Model Poisoning Attacks in Federated Learning: A Surveycited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.
3 papers.