mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Resilience in Online Federated Learning: Mitigating Model-Poisoning Attacks via Partial Sharing

arXiv 2403.13108 ↗First posted 19 Mar 2024cs.LG cs.CR cs.DCcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Federated learning (FL) allows training machine learning models on distributed data without compromising privacy. However, FL is vulnerable to model-poisoning attacks where malicious clients tamper with their local models to manipulate the global model. In this work, we investigate the resilience of the partial-sharing online FL (PSO-Fed) algorithm against such attacks. PSO-Fed reduces communication overhead by allowing clients to share only a fraction of their model updates with the server. We demonstrate that this partial sharing mechanism has the added advantage of enhancing PSO-Fed's robustness to model-poisoning attacks. Through theoretical analysis, we show that PSO-Fed maintains convergence even under Byzantine attacks, where malicious clients inject noise into their updates. Furthermore, we derive a formula for PSO-Fed's mean square error, considering factors like stepsize, attack probability, and the number of malicious clients. Interestingly, we find a non-trivial optimal stepsize that maximizes PSO-Fed's resistance to these attacks. Extensive numerical experiments confirm our theoretical findings and showcase PSO-Fed's superior performance against model-poisoning attacks compared to other leading FL algorithms.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Mar 2024.

Builds on

21 of 51 references.

References · 21

  1. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
  2. 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,221
  3. 2018Byzantine-Robust Distributed Learning: Towards Optimal Statistical Ratescited by 698
  4. 2017Evasion Attacks against Machine Learning at Test Timecited by 686
  5. 2017Federated Multi-Task Learningcited by 669
  6. 2018signSGD: Compressed Optimisation for Non-Convex Problemscited by 561
  7. 2019Local Model Poisoning Attacks to Byzantine-Robust Federated Learningcited by 479
  8. 2020FLTrust: Byzantine-robust Federated Learning via Trust Bootstrappingcited by 330
  9. 2018The Hidden Vulnerability of Distributed Learning in Byzantiumcited by 324
  10. 2020FetchSGD: Communication-Efficient Federated Learning with Sketchingcited by 178
  11. 2022MPAF: Model Poisoning Attacks to Federated Learning based on Fake Clientscited by 65
  12. 2020Data Poisoning Attacks on Federated Machine Learningcited by 58
9 more
  1. 2022FedRecover: Recovering from Poisoning Attacks in Federated Learning using Historical Informationcited by 53
  2. 2019BRIDGE: Byzantine-resilient Decentralized Gradient Descentcited by 45
  3. 2017ByRDiE: Byzantine-resilient distributed coordinate descent for decentralized learningcited by 36
  4. 2020Stochastic-Sign SGD for Federated Learning with Theoretical Guaranteescited by 34
  5. 2021Communication-Efficient Online Federated Learning Framework for Nonlinear Regressioncited by 16
  6. 2021BROADCAST: Reducing Both Stochastic and Compression Noise to Robustify Communication-Efficient Federated Learningcited by 12
  7. 20211-Bit Compressive Sensing for Efficient Federated Learning Over the Aircited by 10
  8. 2015Consensus based Detection in the Presence of Data Falsification Attackscited by 5
  9. 2022Defense Strategies Toward Model Poisoning Attacks in Federated Learning: A Surveycited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.

3 papers.