mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Dataset and Benchmark for Copyright Infringement Unlearning from Text-to-Image Diffusion Models

arXiv 2403.12052 ↗First posted 4 Jan 2024cs.CVcited by 11

On the map: Diffusion models → Robustness, privacy and adversarial aspects

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Copyright law confers upon creators the exclusive rights to reproduce, distribute, and monetize their creative works. However, recent progress in text-to-image generation has introduced formidable challenges to copyright enforcement. These technologies enable the unauthorized learning and replication of copyrighted content, artistic creations, and likenesses, leading to the proliferation of unregulated content. Notably, models like stable diffusion, which excel in text-to-image synthesis, heighten the risk of copyright infringement and unauthorized distribution.Machine unlearning, which seeks to eradicate the influence of specific data or concepts from machine learning models, emerges as a promising solution by eliminating the enquotecopyright memories ingrained in diffusion models. Yet, the absence of comprehensive large-scale datasets and standardized benchmarks for evaluating the efficacy of unlearning techniques in the copyright protection scenarios impedes the development of more effective unlearning methods. To address this gap, we introduce a novel pipeline that harmonizes CLIP, ChatGPT, and diffusion models to curate a dataset. This dataset encompasses anchor images, associated prompts, and images synthesized by text-to-image models. Additionally, we have developed a mixed metric based on semantic and style information, validated through both human and artist assessments, to gauge the effectiveness of unlearning approaches. Our dataset, benchmark library, and evaluation metrics will be made publicly available to foster future research and practical applications (https://rmpku.github.io/CPDM-page/, website / http://149.104.22.83/unlearning.tar.gz, dataset).

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Robustness, privacy and adversarial aspects, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models. Builds on 31 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jan 2024.

Builds on

31 of 48 references.

Closest ancestors · 5

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023Unified Concept Editing in Diffusion Models25 Aug
  2. 2023Forget-Me-Not: Learning to Forget in Text-to-Image Diffusion Models30 Mar
  3. 2023Ablating Concepts in Text-to-Image Diffusion Models23 Mar
  4. 2023Erasing Concepts from Diffusion Models13 Mar
  5. 2023Extracting Training Data from Diffusion Models30 Jan

Other references · 26

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 20,851
  3. 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,694
  4. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  5. 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,029
  6. 2022Hierarchical Text-Conditional Image Generation with CLIP Latentscited by 6,539
  7. 2022Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,603
  8. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
  9. 2015Deep Compression: Compressing Deep Neural Networks with Pruning, Trained Quantization and Huffman Codingcited by 2,291
  10. 2015Learning both Weights and Connections for Efficient Neural Networkscited by 1,998
  11. 2019Machine Unlearningcited by 1,020
  12. 2021Blended Diffusion for Text-driven Editing of Natural Imagescited by 924
14 more
  1. 2022DiffEdit: Diffusion-based semantic image editing with mask guidancecited by 643
  2. 2019Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Net: Selective Forgetting in Deep Networkscited by 599
  3. 2019Certified Data Removal from Machine Learning Modelscited by 512
  4. 2015A Neural Algorithm of Artistic Stylecited by 480
  5. 2019Making AI Forget You: Data Deletion in Machine Learningcited by 447
  6. 2022Knowledge Unlearning for Mitigating Privacy Risks in Language Modelscited by 424
  7. 2022Diffusion Art or Digital Forgery? Investigating Data Replication in Diffusion Modelscited by 418
  8. 2021SRDiff: Single Image Super-Resolution with Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 415
  9. 2020Amnesiac Machine Learningcited by 305
  10. 2021Unlearnable Examples: Making Personal Data Unexploitablecited by 188
  11. 2020When Machine Unlearning Jeopardizes Privacycited by 181
  12. 2013Recognizing Image Stylecited by 64
  13. 2022The ArtBench Dataset: Benchmarking Generative Models with Artworkscited by 64
  14. 2023Diffusion Model for Generative Image Denoisingcited by 27

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 3; 2026: 5.

11 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2023On Copyright Risks of Text-to-Image Diffusion Models
  2. 2025CopyJudge: Automated Copyright Infringement Identification and Mitigation in Text-to-Image Diffusion Models
  3. 2024RLCP: A Reinforcement Learning-based Copyright Protection Method for Text-to-Image Diffusion Model
  4. 2025Copyright Infringement Detection in Text-to-Image Diffusion Models via Differential Privacy
  5. 2025Copyright Infringement Risk Reduction via Chain-of-Thought and Task Instruction Prompting
  6. 2024The Stronger the Diffusion Model, the Easier the Backdoor: Data Poisoning to Induce Copyright Breaches Without Adjusting Finetuning Pipeline
  7. 2024Rethinking Artistic Copyright Infringements in the Era of Text-to-Image Generative Models
  8. 2024Not Every Image is Worth a Thousand Words: Quantifying Originality in Stable Diffusion