Benchmarking Unlearning for Vision Transformers
On the map: LLM safety and security → Machine unlearning
Abstract (arXiv)
Machine unlearning (MU) refers to the post-training capability to remove (the influence of) training examples that are incorrect, biased, or leak sensitive/private information. MU is now widely regarded as critical for building safe and fair AI. In parallel, research into transformer architectures for computer vision has been highly successful: Vision Transformers (VTs) increasingly emerge as strong alternatives to CNNs. Yet, MU research for vision tasks has largely centered on CNNs, not VTs. While MU benchmarks have been developed for LLMs, diffusion models, and CNNs, none currently exist for VTs. This work is the first to attempt this, benchmarking MU algorithm performance across different VT families (ViT, Swin-T, and DINOv2) and at different capacities. The work employs (i) different datasets, selected to assess the impacts of dataset scale and complexity; (ii) different MU algorithms, selected to represent fundamentally different approaches for MU; and (iii) both single-shot and continual unlearning protocols. Additionally, it focuses on benchmarking MU algorithms that leverage training data memorization, since leveraging memorization has been recently discovered to significantly improve the performance of previously SOTA algorithms. En route, the work characterizes how VTs memorize training data relative to CNNs, and assesses the impact of different memorization proxies on performance. The benchmark uses unified evaluation metrics that capture two complementary notions of forget quality along with accuracy on unseen (test) data and on retained data. Overall, this work offers a benchmarking basis, enabling reproducible, fair, and comprehensive comparisons of existing (and future) MU algorithms on VTs. Importantly, for the first time, it sheds light on how well existing algorithms work in VT settings, establishing a promising reference performance baseline.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Machine unlearning, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 30 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Feb 2026.
Builds on
30 of 45 references.
Closest ancestors · 15
Same direction, newest first
- 2025LetheViT: Selective Machine Unlearning for Vision Transformers via Attention-Guided Contrastive Learning3 Aug
- 2024Improved Localized Machine Unlearning Through the Lens of Memorization3 Dec
- 2024MU-Bench: A Multitask Multimodal Benchmark for Machine Unlearning21 Jun
- 2024Are we making progress in unlearning? Findings from the first NeurIPS unlearning competition13 Jun
- 2024What makes unlearning hard and what to do about it3 Jun
- 2024Gone but Not Forgotten: Improved Benchmarks for Machine Unlearning29 May
- 2024To Each (Textual Sequence) Its Own: Improving Memorized-Data Unlearning in Large Language Models6 May
- 2024ViT-MUL: A Baseline Study on Recent Machine Unlearning Methods Applied to Vision Transformers7 Feb
- 2024TOFU: A Task of Fictitious Unlearning for LLMs11 Jan
- 2023SalUn: Empowering Machine Unlearning via Gradient-based Weight Saliency in Both Image Classification and Generation19 Oct
- 2023Model Sparsity Can Simplify Machine Unlearning11 Apr
- 2023Towards Unbounded Machine Unlearning20 Feb
3 more
Other references · 15
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
- 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,764
- 2019Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Net: Selective Forgetting in Deep Networkscited by 599
- 2020What Neural Networks Memorize and Why: Discovering the Long Tail via Influence Estimationcited by 492
- 2019Does Learning Require Memorization? A Short Tale about a Long Tailcited by 452
- 2019Making AI Forget You: Data Deletion in Machine Learningcited by 447
- 2020Descent-to-Delete: Gradient-Based Methods for Machine Unlearningcited by 303
- 2024Detecting, Explaining, and Mitigating Memorization in Diffusion Modelscited by 94
- 2020Characterizing Structural Regularities of Labeled Data in Overparameterized Modelscited by 93
- 2024Unveiling and Mitigating Memorization in Text-to-image Diffusion Models through Cross Attentioncited by 57
3 more
- 2024UnlearnCanvas: Stylized Image Dataset for Enhanced Machine Unlearning Evaluation in Diffusion Modelscited by 47
- 2019Distribution Density, Tails, and Outliers in Machine Learning: Metrics and Applicationscited by 43
- 2024A Dataset and Benchmark for Copyright Infringement Unlearning from Text-to-Image Diffusion Modelscited by 11
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026On the Robustness of Machine Unlearning for Vision-Language Models
- 2026Spectral Saliency for Machine Unlearning
- 2026Metric Unreliability in Multimodal Machine Unlearning: A Systematic Analysis and Principled Unified Score
- 2024Model Integrity when Unlearning with T2I Diffusion Models
- 2024Machine Unlearning in Generative AI: A Survey
- 2024CLEAR: Character Unlearning in Textual and Visual Modalities
- 2025On the Impossibility of Retrain Equivalence in Machine Unlearning
- 2026PECKER: A Precisely Efficient Critical Knowledge Erasure Recipe For Machine Unlearning in Diffusion Models