Pointer-Generator Networks for Low-Resource Machine Translation: Don't Copy That!
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
While Transformer-based neural machine translation (NMT) is very effective in high-resource settings, many languages lack the necessary large parallel corpora to benefit from it. In the context of low-resource (LR) MT between two closely-related languages, a natural intuition is to seek benefits from structural "shortcuts", such as copying subwords from the source to the target, given that such language pairs often share a considerable number of identical words, cognates, and borrowings. We test Pointer-Generator Networks for this purpose for six language pairs over a variety of resource ranges, and find weak improvements for most settings. However, analysis shows that the model does not show greater improvements for closely-related vs. more distant language pairs, or for lower resource ranges, and that the models do not exhibit the expected usage of the mechanism for shared subwords. Our discussion of the reasons for this behaviour highlights several general challenges for LR NMT, such as modern tokenization strategies, noisy real-world conditions, and linguistic complexities. We call for better scrutiny of linguistically motivated improvements to NMT given the blackbox nature of Transformer models, as well as for a focus on the above problems in the field.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Mar 2024.
Builds on
26 of 40 references.
References · 26
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2022No Language Left Behind: Scaling Human-Centered Machine Translationcited by 1,312
- 2017Get To The Point: Summarization with Pointer-Generator Networkscited by 1,292
- 2015Pointer Networkscited by 895
- 2020The State and Fate of Linguistic Diversity and Inclusion in the NLP Worldcited by 798
- 2017Six Challenges for Neural Machine Translationcited by 335
- 2019WikiMatrix: Mining 135M Parallel Sentences in 1620 Language Pairs from Wikipediacited by 223
- 2016Incorporating Copying Mechanism in Sequence-to-Sequence Learningcited by 218
- 2019CCMatrix: Mining Billions of High-Quality Parallel Sentences on the WEBcited by 177
- 2021Between words and characters: A Brief History of Open-Vocabulary Modeling and Tokenization in NLPcited by 132
- 2016Neural Summarization by Extracting Sentences and Wordscited by 116
14 more
- 2021Survey of Low-Resource Machine Translationcited by 92
- 2023XLM-V: Overcoming the Vocabulary Bottleneck in Multilingual Masked Language Modelscited by 88
- 2023Spanish Pre-trained BERT Model and Evaluation Datacited by 81
- 2019Revisiting Low-Resource Neural Machine Translation: A Case Studycited by 61
- 2020Improving Multilingual Models with Language-Clustered Vocabulariescited by 53
- 2016Pointing the Unknown Wordscited by 43
- 2022L3Cube-HindBERT and DevBERT: Pre-Trained BERT Transformer models for Devanagari based Hindi and Marathi Languagescited by 35
- 2020When and Why is Unsupervised Neural Machine Translation Useless?cited by 34
- 2018How Much Does Tokenization Affect Neural Machine Translation?cited by 26
- 2021Allocating Large Vocabulary Capacity for Cross-lingual Language Model Pre-trainingcited by 22
- 2018Morphological and Language-Agnostic Word Segmentation for NMTcited by 16
- 2020Revisiting Low Resource Status of Indian Languages in Machine Translationcited by 12
- 2020Morphological Word Segmentation on Agglutinative Languages for Neural Machine Translationcited by 11
- 2020Linguistic Resources for Bhojpuri, Magahi and Maithili: Statistics about them, their Similarity Estimates, and Baselines for Three Applicationscited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.