mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Revisiting Adversarial Training under Long-Tailed Distributions

arXiv 2403.10073 ↗First posted 15 Mar 2024cs.CVcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep neural networks are vulnerable to adversarial attacks, often leading to erroneous outputs. Adversarial training has been recognized as one of the most effective methods to counter such attacks. However, existing adversarial training techniques have predominantly been tested on balanced datasets, whereas real-world data often exhibit a long-tailed distribution, casting doubt on the efficacy of these methods in practical scenarios. In this paper, we delve into adversarial training under long-tailed distributions. Through an analysis of the previous work "RoBal", we discover that utilizing Balanced Softmax Loss alone can achieve performance comparable to the complete RoBal approach while significantly reducing training overheads. Additionally, we reveal that, similar to uniform distributions, adversarial training under long-tailed distributions also suffers from robust overfitting. To address this, we explore data augmentation as a solution and unexpectedly discover that, unlike results obtained with balanced data, data augmentation not only effectively alleviates robust overfitting but also significantly improves robustness. We further investigate the reasons behind the improvement of robustness through data augmentation and identify that it is attributable to the increased diversity of examples. Extensive experiments further corroborate that data augmentation alone can significantly improve robustness. Finally, building on these findings, we demonstrate that compared to RoBal, the combination of BSL and data augmentation leads to a +6.66% improvement in model robustness under AutoAttack on CIFAR-10-LT. Our code is available at https://github.com/NISPLab/AT-BSL .

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 41 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Mar 2024.

Builds on

41 of 56 references.

References · 41

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  3. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  4. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
  5. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  6. 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,057
  7. 2022Elucidating the Design Space of Diffusion-Based Generative Modelscited by 2,994
  8. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
  9. 2019CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers with Localizable Featurescited by 2,875
  10. 2019RandAugment: Practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search spacecited by 2,261
  11. 2016Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networkscited by 1,960
  12. 2017Improved Regularization of Convolutional Neural Networks with Cutoutcited by 1,623
29 more
  1. 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,510
  2. 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,442
  3. 2019Class-Balanced Loss Based on Effective Number of Samplescited by 1,239
  4. 2019LVIS: A Dataset for Large Vocabulary Instance Segmentationcited by 1,215
  5. 2019AugMix: A Simple Data Processing Method to Improve Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 897
  6. 2019Decoupling Representation and Classifier for Long-Tailed Recognitioncited by 806
  7. 2020Long-tail learning via logit adjustmentcited by 605
  8. 2020Overfitting in adversarially robust deep learningcited by 504
  9. 2019Unlabeled Data Improves Adversarial Robustnesscited by 415
  10. 2020Balanced Meta-Softmax for Long-Tailed Visual Recognitioncited by 397
  11. 2020Uncovering the Limits of Adversarial Training against Norm-Bounded Adversarial Examplescited by 275
  12. 2021TrivialAugment: Tuning-free Yet State-of-the-Art Data Augmentationcited by 225
  13. 2023Better Diffusion Models Further Improve Adversarial Trainingcited by 207
  14. 2020Geometry-aware Instance-reweighted Adversarial Trainingcited by 198
  15. 2021Data Augmentation Can Improve Robustnesscited by 193
  16. 2020To be Robust or to be Fair: Towards Fairness in Adversarial Trainingcited by 137
  17. 2020The Devil is in Classification: A Simple Framework for Long-tail Object Detection and Instance Segmentationcited by 108
  18. 2020Boosting Adversarial Training with Hypersphere Embeddingcited by 97
  19. 2022LAS-AT: Adversarial Training with Learnable Attack Strategycited by 94
  20. 2020Adversarial Vertex Mixup: Toward Better Adversarially Robust Generalizationcited by 73
  21. 2021Learning Fast Sample Re-weighting Without Reward Datacited by 69
  22. 2023CFA: Class-wise Calibrated Fair Adversarial Trainingcited by 53
  23. 2021Adversarial Robustness under Long-Tailed Distributioncited by 50
  24. 2022Efficient and Effective Augmentation Strategy for Adversarial Trainingcited by 43
  25. 2023Data Augmentation Alone Can Improve Adversarial Trainingcited by 43
  26. 2023Global and Local Mixture Consistency Cumulative Learning for Long-tailed Visual Recognitionscited by 43
  27. 2021Towards Calibrated Model for Long-Tailed Visual Recognition from Prior Perspectivecited by 39
  28. 2023CUDA: Curriculum of Data Augmentation for Long-Tailed Recognitioncited by 30
  29. 2021Evaluating the Robustness of Geometry-Aware Instance-Reweighted Adversarial Trainingcited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 5; 2026: 6.

13 papers.

Sort: