mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

When Semantic Segmentation Meets Frequency Aliasing

arXiv 2403.09065 ↗First posted 14 Mar 2024cs.CVcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Despite recent advancements in semantic segmentation, where and what pixels are hard to segment remains largely unexplored. Existing research only separates an image into easy and hard regions and empirically observes the latter are associated with object boundaries. In this paper, we conduct a comprehensive analysis of hard pixel errors, categorizing them into three types: false responses, merging mistakes, and displacements. Our findings reveal a quantitative association between hard pixels and aliasing, which is distortion caused by the overlapping of frequency components in the Fourier domain during downsampling. To identify the frequencies responsible for aliasing, we propose using the equivalent sampling rate to calculate the Nyquist frequency, which marks the threshold for aliasing. Then, we introduce the aliasing score as a metric to quantify the extent of aliasing. While positively correlated with the proposed aliasing score, three types of hard pixels exhibit different patterns. Here, we propose two novel de-aliasing filter (DAF) and frequency mixing (FreqMix) modules to alleviate aliasing degradation by accurately removing or adjusting frequencies higher than the Nyquist frequency. The DAF precisely removes the frequencies responsible for aliasing before downsampling, while the FreqMix dynamically selects high-frequency components within the encoder block. Experimental results demonstrate consistent improvements in semantic segmentation and low-light instance segmentation tasks. The code is available at: https://github.com/Linwei-Chen/Seg-Aliasing.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 56 of its 81 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Mar 2024.

Builds on

56 of 81 references.

References · 56

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
  4. 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,339
  5. 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,893
  6. 2016Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detectioncited by 5,021
  7. 2014Fully Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentationcited by 4,845
  8. 2016The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understandingcited by 4,427
  9. 2022A ConvNet for the 2020scited by 3,545
  10. 2021Masked-attention Mask Transformer for Universal Image Segmentationcited by 2,338
  11. 2017Rethinking Atrous Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 2,154
  12. 2018On the Spectral Bias of Neural Networkscited by 1,321
38 more
  1. 2018Unified Perceptual Parsing for Scene Understandingcited by 1,265
  2. 2021Alias-Free Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 1,181
  3. 2021Tokens-to-Token ViT: Training Vision Transformers from Scratch on ImageNetcited by 1,096
  4. 2022Planning-oriented Autonomous Drivingcited by 1,068
  5. 2016Training Region-based Object Detectors with Online Hard Example Miningcited by 577
  6. 2020Zero-Reference Deep Curve Estimation for Low-Light Image Enhancementcited by 541
  7. 2021RepVGG: Making VGG-style ConvNets Great Againcited by 520
  8. 2022InternImage: Exploring Large-Scale Vision Foundation Models with Deformable Convolutionscited by 479
  9. 2019EnlightenGAN: Deep Light Enhancement without Paired Supervisioncited by 466
  10. 2018Learning to See in the Darkcited by 459
  11. 2019PointRend: Image Segmentation as Renderingcited by 439
  12. 2019Making Convolutional Networks Shift-Invariant Againcited by 390
  13. 2020Watch your Up-Convolution: CNN Based Generative Deep Neural Networks are Failing to Reproduce Spectral Distributionscited by 278
  14. 2020Learning in the Frequency Domaincited by 196
  15. 2021Boundary IoU: Improving Object-Centric Image Segmentation Evaluationcited by 186
  16. 2020FcaNet: Frequency Channel Attention Networkscited by 177
  17. 2019Pattern-Affinitive Propagation across Depth, Surface Normal and Semantic Segmentationcited by 141
  18. 2020A Physics-based Noise Formation Model for Extreme Low-light Raw Denoisingcited by 138
  19. 2020Semantic Flow for Fast and Accurate Scene Parsingcited by 128
  20. 2019Boundary-Aware Feature Propagation for Scene Segmentationcited by 107
  21. 2022HorNet: Efficient High-Order Spatial Interactions with Recursive Gated Convolutionscited by 103
  22. 2020Improving Semantic Segmentation via Decoupled Body and Edge Supervisioncited by 98
  23. 2020SegFix: Model-Agnostic Boundary Refinement for Segmentationcited by 97
  24. 2021FaPN: Feature-aligned Pyramid Network for Dense Image Predictioncited by 81
  25. 2021Physics-based Noise Modeling for Extreme Low-light Photographycited by 67
  26. 2022Dilated Neighborhood Attention Transformercited by 64
  27. 2020Delving Deeper into Anti-aliasing in ConvNetscited by 60
  28. 2017Not All Pixels Are Equal: Difficulty-aware Semantic Segmentation via Deep Layer Cascadecited by 53
  29. 2021Learning Statistical Texture for Semantic Segmentationcited by 50
  30. 2023Instance Segmentation in the Darkcited by 45
  31. 2023Adaptive Frequency Filters As Efficient Global Token Mixerscited by 45
  32. 2020Deep frequency principle towards understanding why deeper learning is fastercited by 30
  33. 2020Spectral Distribution Aware Image Generationcited by 29
  34. 2021WaveCNet: Wavelet Integrated CNNs to Suppress Aliasing Effect for Noise-Robust Image Classificationcited by 29
  35. 2022FrequencyLowCut Pooling -- Plug & Play against Catastrophic Overfittingcited by 28
  36. 2018Guided Upsampling Network for Real-Time Semantic Segmentationcited by 24
  37. 2023Head-Free Lightweight Semantic Segmentation with Linear Transformercited by 22
  38. 2022NightLab: A Dual-level Architecture with Hardness Detection for Segmentation at Nightcited by 21

50 most cited of 56 All 56 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 5; 2026: 2.

10 papers.