Generalizing Fairness to Generative Language Models via Reformulation of Non-discrimination Criteria
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Generative AI, such as large language models, has undergone rapid development within recent years. As these models become increasingly available to the public, concerns arise about perpetuating and amplifying harmful biases in applications. Gender stereotypes can be harmful and limiting for the individuals they target, whether they consist of misrepresentation or discrimination. Recognizing gender bias as a pervasive societal construct, this paper studies how to uncover and quantify the presence of gender biases in generative language models. In particular, we derive generative AI analogues of three well-known non-discrimination criteria from classification, namely independence, separation and sufficiency. To demonstrate these criteria in action, we design prompts for each of the criteria with a focus on occupational gender stereotype, specifically utilizing the medical test to introduce the ground truth in the generative AI context. Our results address the presence of occupational gender bias within such conversational language models.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Mar 2024.
Builds on
24 of 39 references.
References · 24
- 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
- 2020What Disease does this Patient Have? A Large-scale Open Domain Question Answering Dataset from Medical Examscited by 1,324
- 2021Ethical and social risks of harm from Language Modelscited by 957
- 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
- 2018Gender Bias in Coreference Resolution: Evaluation and Debiasing Methodscited by 657
- 2016Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scorescited by 582
- 2019The Woman Worked as a Babysitter: On Biases in Language Generationcited by 540
- 2020Fairness in Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 369
- 2017Fairness in Criminal Justice Risk Assessments: The State of the Artcited by 315
- 2021Towards Understanding and Mitigating Social Biases in Language Modelscited by 294
- 2023"Kelly is a Warm Person, Joseph is a Role Model": Gender Biases in LLM-Generated Reference Letterscited by 196
- 2022Can large language models reason about medical questions?cited by 194
12 more
- 2023Gender bias and stereotypes in Large Language Modelscited by 185
- 2020Minimax Pareto Fairness: A Multi Objective Perspectivecited by 152
- 2021Bias Out-of-the-Box: An Empirical Analysis of Intersectional Occupational Biases in Popular Generative Language Modelscited by 141
- 2019Predictive Biases in Natural Language Processing Models: A Conceptual Framework and Overviewcited by 137
- 2021A Clarification of the Nuances in the Fairness Metrics Landscapecited by 98
- 2018A Moral Framework for Understanding of Fair ML through Economic Models of Equality of Opportunitycited by 53
- 2020Fairness Metrics: A Comparative Analysiscited by 45
- 2018Anaphora and Coreference Resolution: A Reviewcited by 31
- 2021Modeling Techniques for Machine Learning Fairness: A Surveycited by 17
- 2018Evaluating Fairness Metrics in the Presence of Dataset Biascited by 15
- 2020Fair Prediction with Endogenous Behaviorcited by 10
- 2020Metrics and methods for a systematic comparison of fairness-aware machine learning algorithmscited by 7
Built on by
Not cited yet.