mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Neural network optimization strategies and the topography of the loss landscape

arXiv 2602.21276 ↗First posted 24 Feb 2026cs.LG stat.MLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Neural networks are trained by optimizing multi-dimensional sets of fitting parameters on non-convex loss landscapes. Low-loss regions of the landscapes correspond to the parameter sets that perform well on the training data. A key issue in machine learning is the performance of trained neural networks on previously unseen test data. Here, we investigate neural network training by stochastic gradient descent (SGD) - a non-convex global optimization algorithm which relies only on the gradient of the objective function. We contrast SGD solutions with those obtained via a non-stochastic quasi-Newton method, which utilizes curvature information to determine step direction and Golden Section Search to choose step size. We use several computational tools to investigate neural network parameters obtained by these two optimization methods, including kernel Principal Component Analysis and a novel, general-purpose algorithm for finding low-height paths between pairs of points on loss or energy landscapes, FourierPathFinder. We find that the choice of the optimizer profoundly affects the nature of the resulting solutions. SGD solutions tend to be separated by lower barriers than quasi-Newton solutions, even if both sets of solutions are regularized by early stopping to ensure adequate performance on test data. When allowed to fit extensively on the training data, quasi-Newton solutions occupy deeper minima on the loss landscapes that are not reached by SGD. These solutions are less generalizable to the test data however. Overall, SGD explores smooth basins of attraction, while quasi-Newton optimization is capable of finding deeper, more isolated minima that are more spread out in the parameter space. Our findings help understand both the topography of the loss landscapes and the fundamental role of landscape exploration strategies in creating robust, transferrable neural network models.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Feb 2026.

Builds on

17 of 39 references.

References · 17

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2016On Large-Batch Training for Deep Learning: Generalization Gap and Sharp Minimacited by 1,337
  3. 2016Optimization Methods for Large-Scale Machine Learningcited by 1,140
  4. 2017Visualizing the Loss Landscape of Neural Netscited by 1,126
  5. 2018Loss Surfaces, Mode Connectivity, and Fast Ensembling of DNNscited by 585
  6. 2016Entropy-SGD: Biasing Gradient Descent Into Wide Valleyscited by 357
  7. 2018Essentially No Barriers in Neural Network Energy Landscapecited by 328
  8. 2019An Investigation into Neural Net Optimization via Hessian Eigenvalue Densitycited by 289
  9. 2017Three Factors Influencing Minima in SGDcited by 270
  10. 2017The Marginal Value of Adaptive Gradient Methods in Machine Learningcited by 248
  11. 2014Qualitatively characterizing neural network optimization problemscited by 186
  12. 2015A Simple Way to Initialize Recurrent Networks of Rectified Linear Unitscited by 130
5 more
  1. 2018A high-bias, low-variance introduction to Machine Learning for physicistscited by 108
  2. 2018Hessian-based Analysis of Large Batch Training and Robustness to Adversariescited by 87
  3. 2019SGD Converges to Global Minimum in Deep Learning via Star-convex Pathcited by 39
  4. 2019How noise affects the Hessian spectrum in overparameterized neural networkscited by 17
  5. 2024Do Deep Neural Network Solutions Form a Star Domain?cited by 6

Built on by

Not cited yet.