mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

COOD: Combined out-of-distribution detection using multiple measures for anomaly & novel class detection in large-scale hierarchical classification

arXiv 2403.06874 ↗First posted 11 Mar 2024cs.CV cs.LGcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

High-performing out-of-distribution (OOD) detection, both anomaly and novel class, is an important prerequisite for the practical use of classification models. In this paper, we focus on the species recognition task in images concerned with large databases, a large number of fine-grained hierarchical classes, severe class imbalance, and varying image quality. We propose a framework for combining individual OOD measures into one combined OOD (COOD) measure using a supervised model. The individual measures are several existing state-of-the-art measures and several novel OOD measures developed with novel class detection and hierarchical class structure in mind. COOD was extensively evaluated on three large-scale (500k+ images) biodiversity datasets in the context of anomaly and novel class detection. We show that COOD outperforms individual, including state-of-the-art, OOD measures by a large margin in terms of TPR@1% FPR in the majority of experiments, e.g., improving detecting ImageNet images (OOD) from 54.3% to 85.4% for the iNaturalist 2018 dataset. SHAP (feature contribution) analysis shows that different individual OOD measures are essential for various tasks, indicating that multiple OOD measures and combinations are needed to generalize. Additionally, we show that explicitly considering ID images that are incorrectly classified for the original (species) recognition task is important for constructing high-performing OOD detection methods and for practical applicability. The framework can easily be extended or adapted to other tasks and media modalities.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Mar 2024.

Builds on

24 of 39 references.

References · 24

  1. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
  2. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
  3. 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,362
  4. 2016Concrete Problems in AI Safetycited by 1,582
  5. 2017Enhancing The Reliability of Out-of-distribution Image Detection in Neural Networkscited by 1,325
  6. 2020Energy-based Out-of-distribution Detectioncited by 1,296
  7. 2018Deep Anomaly Detection with Outlier Exposurecited by 939
  8. 2020A Review of Uncertainty Quantification in Deep Learning: Techniques, Applications and Challengescited by 813
  9. 2014Deep Neural Networks are Easily Fooled: High Confidence Predictions for Unrecognizable Imagescited by 774
  10. 2022Out-of-Distribution Detection with Deep Nearest Neighborscited by 596
  11. 2021Towards Out-Of-Distribution Generalization: A Surveycited by 431
  12. 2020A Unifying Review of Deep and Shallow Anomaly Detectioncited by 423
12 more
  1. 2024The Faiss librarycited by 370
  2. 2021Ensemble deep learning: A reviewcited by 283
  3. 2021Exploring the Limits of Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 283
  4. 2021Weakly-supervised Video Anomaly Detection with Robust Temporal Feature Magnitude Learningcited by 226
  5. 2018Deep k-Nearest Neighbors: Towards Confident, Interpretable and Robust Deep Learningcited by 203
  6. 2023In or Out? Fixing ImageNet Out-of-Distribution Detection Evaluationcited by 132
  7. 2020A Review and Comparative Study on Probabilistic Object Detection in Autonomous Drivingcited by 115
  8. 2020Deep Nearest Neighbor Anomaly Detectioncited by 103
  9. 2021No True State-of-the-Art? OOD Detection Methods are Inconsistent across Datasetscited by 31
  10. 2020Out-Of-Distribution Detection With Subspace Techniques And Probabilistic Modeling Of Featurescited by 20
  11. 2019Are Out-of-Distribution Detection Methods Effective on Large-Scale Datasets?cited by 6
  12. 2018Examining the Use of Neural Networks for Feature Extraction: A Comparative Analysis using Deep Learning, Support Vector Machines, and K-Nearest Neighbor Classifierscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

5 papers.