mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

PPTC-R benchmark: Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Large Language Models for PowerPoint Task Completion

arXiv 2403.03788 ↗First posted 6 Mar 2024cs.CLcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The growing dependence on Large Language Models (LLMs) for finishing user instructions necessitates a comprehensive understanding of their robustness to complex task completion in real-world situations. To address this critical need, we propose the PowerPoint Task Completion Robustness benchmark (PPTC-R) to measure LLMs' robustness to the user PPT task instruction and software version. Specifically, we construct adversarial user instructions by attacking user instructions at sentence, semantic, and multi-language levels. To assess the robustness of Language Models to software versions, we vary the number of provided APIs to simulate both the newest version and earlier version settings. Subsequently, we test 3 closed-source and 4 open-source LLMs using a benchmark that incorporates these robustness settings, aiming to evaluate how deviations impact LLMs' API calls for task completion. We find that GPT-4 exhibits the highest performance and strong robustness in our benchmark, particularly in the version update and the multilingual settings. However, we find that all LLMs lose their robustness when confronted with multiple challenges (e.g., multi-turn) simultaneously, leading to significant performance drops. We further analyze the robustness behavior and error reasons of LLMs in our benchmark, which provide valuable insights for researchers to understand the LLM's robustness in task completion and develop more robust LLMs and agents. We release the code and data at urlhttps://github.com/ZekaiGalaxy/PPTCR.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Mar 2024.

Builds on

32 of 52 references.

References · 32

  1. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
  2. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
  3. 2023Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4cited by 2,592
  4. 2022Do As I Can, Not As I Say: Grounding Language in Robotic Affordancescited by 2,348
  5. 2022Competition-Level Code Generation with AlphaCodecited by 1,462
  6. 2023Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code Generationcited by 1,391
  7. 2022WebShop: Towards Scalable Real-World Web Interaction with Grounded Language Agentscited by 1,251
  8. 2023WizardLM: Empowering large pre-trained language models to follow complex instructionscited by 1,125
  9. 2020Beyond Accuracy: Behavioral Testing of NLP models with CheckListcited by 1,006
  10. 2018XNLI: Evaluating Cross-lingual Sentence Representationscited by 915
  11. 2019Adversarial NLI: A New Benchmark for Natural Language Understandingcited by 807
  12. 2023AGIEval: A Human-Centric Benchmark for Evaluating Foundation Modelscited by 716
20 more
  1. 2023Baichuan 2: Open Large-scale Language Modelscited by 670
  2. 2023DecodingTrust: A Comprehensive Assessment of Trustworthiness in GPT Modelscited by 518
  3. 2023Is ChatGPT a General-Purpose Natural Language Processing Task Solver?cited by 488
  4. 2018VirtualHome: Simulating Household Activities via Programscited by 415
  5. 2023Language Models can Solve Computer Taskscited by 372
  6. 2023Android in the Wild: A Large-Scale Dataset for Android Device Controlcited by 319
  7. 2018Reinforcement Learning on Web Interfaces Using Workflow-Guided Explorationcited by 284
  8. 2022RealTime QA: What's the Answer Right Now?cited by 244
  9. 2021Adversarial GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark for Robustness Evaluation of Language Modelscited by 232
  10. 2023PromptRobust: Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Large Language Models on Adversarial Promptscited by 226
  11. 2018Stress Test Evaluation for Natural Language Inferencecited by 213
  12. 2023On the Robustness of ChatGPT: An Adversarial and Out-of-distribution Perspectivecited by 211
  13. 2023Evaluating the Logical Reasoning Ability of ChatGPT and GPT-4cited by 202
  14. 2023TaskMatrix.AI: Completing Tasks by Connecting Foundation Models with Millions of APIscited by 184
  15. 2021BEHAVIOR: Benchmark for Everyday Household Activities in Virtual, Interactive, and Ecological Environmentscited by 165
  16. 2023Is ChatGPT a Good Sentiment Analyzer? A Preliminary Studycited by 96
  17. 2023Are Large Language Models Really Robust to Word-Level Perturbations?cited by 32
  18. 2023PPTC Benchmark: Evaluating Large Language Models for PowerPoint Task Completioncited by 30
  19. 2023Language Models can be Logical Solverscited by 24
  20. 2023ChatGPT's One-year Anniversary: Are Open-Source Large Language Models Catching up?cited by 15

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 5; 2026: 4.

9 papers.