mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

DIVERSE: A Dataset of YouTube Video Comment Stances with a Data Programming Model

arXiv 2403.03334 ↗First posted 5 Mar 2024cs.CL cs.AIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Public opinion of military organizations significantly influences their ability to recruit talented individuals. As recruitment efforts increasingly extend into digital spaces like social media, it becomes essential to assess the stance of social media users toward online military content. However, there is a notable lack of data for analyzing opinions on military recruiting efforts online, compounded by challenges in stance labeling, which is crucial for understanding public perceptions. Despite the importance of stance analysis for successful online military recruitment, creating human-annotated, in-domain stance labels is resource-intensive. In this paper, we address both the challenges of stance labeling and the scarcity of data on public opinions of online military recruitment by introducing and releasing the DIVERSE dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10493803. This dataset comprises all comments from the U.S. Army's official YouTube Channel videos. We employed a state-of-the-art weak supervision approach, leveraging large language models to label the stance of each comment toward its respective video and the U.S. Army. Our findings indicate that the U.S. Army's videos began attracting a significant number of comments post-2021, with the stance distribution generally balanced among supportive, oppositional, and neutral comments, with a slight skew towards oppositional versus supportive comments.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Mar 2024.

Builds on

20 of 51 references.

References · 20

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
  3. 2023Mistral 7Bcited by 3,164
  4. 2023Can Large Language Models Transform Computational Social Science?cited by 250
  5. 2016Data Programming: Creating Large Training Sets, Quicklycited by 246
  6. 2018Training Complex Models with Multi-Task Weak Supervisioncited by 106
  7. 2020Stance Detection on Social Media: State of the Art and Trendscited by 95
  8. 2022How would Stance Detection Techniques Evolve after the Launch of ChatGPT?cited by 76
  9. 2023Can we trust the evaluation on ChatGPT?cited by 63
  10. 2018All-in-one: Multi-task Learning for Rumour Verificationcited by 54
  11. 2020Will-They-Won't-They: A Very Large Dataset for Stance Detection on Twittercited by 54
  12. 2022Language Models in the Loop: Incorporating Prompting into Weak Supervisioncited by 52
8 more
  1. 2020Deep Learning Models for Multilingual Hate Speech Detectioncited by 49
  2. 2023Investigating Chain-of-thought with ChatGPT for Stance Detection on Social Mediacited by 23
  3. 2020Stance in Replies and Quotes (SRQ): A New Dataset For Learning Stance in Twitter Conversationscited by 14
  4. 2023Automated stance detection in complex topics and small languages: the challenging case of immigration in polarizing news mediacited by 14
  5. 2023YouNICon: YouTube's CommuNIty of Conspiracy Videoscited by 13
  6. 2023Chain-of-Thought Embeddings for Stance Detection on Social Mediacited by 13
  7. 2023It Takes Two to Negotiate: Modeling Social Exchange in Online Multiplayer Gamescited by 8
  8. 2023A Logically Consistent Chain-of-Thought Approach for Stance Detectioncited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

2 papers.