mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

ChatCite: LLM Agent with Human Workflow Guidance for Comparative Literature Summary

arXiv 2403.02574 ↗First posted 5 Mar 2024cs.IR cs.AI cs.CLcited by 30

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Web, search, and research agents

Abstract (arXiv)

The literature review is an indispensable step in the research process. It provides the benefit of comprehending the research problem and understanding the current research situation while conducting a comparative analysis of prior works. However, literature summary is challenging and time consuming. The previous LLM-based studies on literature review mainly focused on the complete process, including literature retrieval, screening, and summarization. However, for the summarization step, simple CoT method often lacks the ability to provide extensive comparative summary. In this work, we firstly focus on the independent literature summarization step and introduce ChatCite, an LLM agent with human workflow guidance for comparative literature summary. This agent, by mimicking the human workflow, first extracts key elements from relevant literature and then generates summaries using a Reflective Incremental Mechanism. In order to better evaluate the quality of the generated summaries, we devised a LLM-based automatic evaluation metric, G-Score, in refer to the human evaluation criteria. The ChatCite agent outperformed other models in various dimensions in the experiments. The literature summaries generated by ChatCite can also be directly used for drafting literature reviews.

Key facts. Cited by 30 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Web, search, and research agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 7 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Mar 2024.

Builds on

7 of 18 references.

References · 7

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  3. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  4. 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,276
  5. 2022News Summarization and Evaluation in the Era of GPT-3cited by 327
  6. 2024LitLLM: A Toolkit for Scientific Literature Reviewcited by 63
  7. 2022Target-aware Abstractive Related Work Generation with Contrastive Learningcited by 20

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 7; 2025: 19; 2026: 4.

30 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2025Towards Scientific Intelligence: A Survey of LLM-based Scientific Agentscited by 98
  2. 2025Transforming Science with Large Language Models: A Survey on AI-assisted Scientific Discovery, Experimentation, Content Generation, and Evaluationcited by 42
  3. 2025A Survey of Large Language Model Empowered Agents for Recommendation and Search: Towards Next-Generation Information Retrievalcited by 33
  4. 2024AIGS: Generating Science from AI-Powered Automated Falsificationcited by 18
  5. 2025MemGuide: Intent-Driven Memory Selection for Goal-Oriented Multi-Session LLM Agentscited by 17
  6. 2025DeepSeek vs. ChatGPT vs. Claude: A Comparative Study for Scientific Computing and Scientific Machine Learning Taskscited by 12
  7. 2025InteractiveSurvey: An LLM-based Personalized and Interactive Survey Paper Generation Systemcited by 12
  8. 2024BioKGBench: A Knowledge Graph Checking Benchmark of AI Agent for Biomedical Sciencecited by 10
  9. 2025Evolving Roles of LLMs in Scientific Innovation: Assistant, Collaborator, Scientist, and Evaluatorcited by 9
  10. 2024Automated Review Generation Method Based on Large Language Modelscited by 7
  11. 2024Cutting Through the Clutter: The Potential of LLMs for Efficient Filtration in Systematic Literature Reviewscited by 6
  12. 2024Exploring Prompt Engineering: A Systematic Review with SWOT Analysiscited by 5
18 more
  1. 2025Completing A Systematic Review in Hours instead of Months with Interactive AI Agentscited by 5
  2. 2025SurveyGen-I: Consistent Scientific Survey Generation with Evolving Plans and Memory-Guided Writingcited by 5
  3. 2026GraphFlow: A Graph-Based Workflow Management for Efficient LLM-Agent Servingcited by 3
  4. 2024Iter-AHMCL: Alleviate Hallucination for Large Language Model via Iterative Model-level Contrastive Learningcited by 2
  5. 2025Modelling and Classifying the Components of a Literature Reviewcited by 2
  6. 2025ResearchPulse: Building Method-Experiment Chains through Multi-Document Scientific Inferencecited by 2
  7. 2025Adaptive and Resource-efficient Agentic AI Systems for Mobile and Embedded Devices: A Surveycited by 2
  8. 2026pAI/MSc: ML Theory Research with Humans on the Loopcited by 2
  9. 2026Multi-Turn Agentic Scientific Literature Search via Workflow Inductioncited by 2
  10. 2025Highlighting Case Studies in LLM Literature Review of Interdisciplinary System Sciencecited by 1
  11. 2025EvoVLMA: Evolutionary Vision-Language Model Adaptationcited by 1
  12. 2025Leveraging LLMs for Semi-Automatic Corpus Filtration in Systematic Literature Reviewscited by 1
  13. 2025From Verification Burden to Trusted Collaboration: Design Goals for LLM-Assisted Literature Reviewscited by 1
  14. 2024Leveraging Large Language Models for Comparative Literature Summarization with Reflective Incremental Mechanismscited by 0
  15. 2025CL2GEC: A Multi-Discipline Benchmark for Continual Learning in Chinese Literature Grammatical Error Correctioncited by 0
  16. 2025An Artificial Intelligence Driven Semantic Similarity-Based Pipeline for Rapid Literaturecited by 0
  17. 2025Remembering Unequally: Global and Disciplinary Bias in LLM Reconstruction of Scholarly Coauthor Listscited by 0
  18. 2026AgenticSum: An Agentic Inference-Time Framework for Faithful Clinical Text Summarizationcited by 0

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026meta-pipe: An LLM-agent pipeline for end-to-end automated systematic review and meta-analysis
  2. 2025LiRA: A Multi-Agent Framework for Reliable and Readable Literature Review Generation
  3. 2025Can Agents Judge Systematic Reviews Like Humans? Evaluating SLRs with LLM-based Multi-Agent System
  4. 2025LatteReview: A Multi-Agent Framework for Systematic Review Automation Using Large Language Models
  5. 2024System for systematic literature review using multiple AI agents: Concept and an empirical evaluation
  6. 2025LLM-REVal: Can We Trust LLM Reviewers Yet?
  7. 2025AISSISTANT: Human-AI Collaborative Review and Perspective Research Workflows in Data Science
  8. 2025ReviewAgents: Bridging the Gap Between Human and AI-Generated Paper Reviews