mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

HyperPredict: Estimating Hyperparameter Effects for Instance-Specific Regularization in Deformable Image Registration

arXiv 2403.02069 ↗First posted 4 Mar 2024cs.CVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Methods for medical image registration infer geometric transformations that align pairs/groups of images by maximising an image similarity metric. This problem is ill-posed as several solutions may have equivalent likelihoods, also optimising purely for image similarity can yield implausible transformations. For these reasons regularization terms are essential to obtain meaningful registration results. However, this requires the introduction of at least one hyperparameter often termed λ, that serves as a tradeoff between loss terms. In some situations, the quality of the estimated transformation greatly depends on hyperparameter choice, and different choices may be required depending on the characteristics of the data. Analyzing the effect of these hyperparameters requires labelled data, which is not commonly available at test-time. In this paper, we propose a method for evaluating the influence of hyperparameters and subsequently selecting an optimal value for given image pairs. Our approach which we call HyperPredict, implements a Multi-Layer Perceptron that learns the effect of selecting particular hyperparameters for registering an image pair by predicting the resulting segmentation overlap and measure of deformation smoothness. This approach enables us to select optimal hyperparameters at test time without requiring labelled data, removing the need for a one-size-fits-all cross-validation approach. Furthermore, the criteria used to define optimal hyperparameter is flexible post-training, allowing us to efficiently choose specific properties. We evaluate our proposed method on the OASIS brain MR dataset using a recent deep learning approach(cLapIRN) and an algorithmic method(Niftyreg). Our results demonstrate good performance in predicting the effects of regularization hyperparameters and highlight the benefits of our image-pair specific approach to hyperparameter selection.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Mar 2024.

Builds on

12 of 41 references.

References · 12

  1. 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,339
  2. 2018VoxelMorph: A Learning Framework for Deformable Medical Image Registrationcited by 657
  3. 2021Bayesian Optimization is Superior to Random Search for Machine Learning Hyperparameter Tuning: Analysis of the Black-Box Optimization Challenge 2020cited by 146
  4. 2020Large Deformation Diffeomorphic Image Registration with Laplacian Pyramid Networkscited by 136
  5. 2020Fast Symmetric Diffeomorphic Image Registration with Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 107
  6. 2021HyperMorph: Amortized Hyperparameter Learning for Image Registrationcited by 84
  7. 2021Conditional Deformable Image Registration with Convolutional Neural Networkcited by 59
  8. 2021Fast 3D registration with accurate optimisation and little learning for Learn2Reg 2021cited by 40
  9. 2019Metric Learning for Image Registrationcited by 30
  10. 2018Estimation of Large Motion in Lung CT by Integrating Regularized Keypoint Correspondences into Dense Deformable Registrationcited by 23
  11. 2021Enhancing Medical Image Registration via Appearance Adjustment Networkscited by 12
  12. 2021Bayesian Atlas Building with Hierarchical Priors for Subject-specific Regularizationcited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.