mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Fine-tuning with Very Large Dropout

arXiv 2403.00946 ↗First posted 1 Mar 2024cs.LG cs.CVcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

It is impossible today to pretend that the practice of machine learning is always compatible with the idea that training and testing data follow the same distribution. Several authors have recently used ensemble techniques to show how scenarios involving multiple data distributions are best served by representations that are both richer than those obtained by regularizing for the best in-distribution performance, and richer than those obtained under the influence of the implicit sparsity bias of common stochastic gradient procedures. This contribution investigates the use of very high dropout rates instead of ensembles to obtain such rich representations. Although training a deep network from scratch using such dropout rates is virtually impossible, fine-tuning a large pre-trained model under such conditions is not only possible but also achieves out-of-distribution performances that exceed those of both ensembles and weight averaging methods such as model soups. This result has practical significance because the importance of the fine-tuning scenario has considerably grown in recent years. This result also provides interesting insights on the nature of rich representations and on the intrinsically linear nature of fine-tuning a large network using a comparatively small dataset.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 56 of its 76 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Mar 2024.

Builds on

56 of 76 references.

References · 56

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
  4. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
  5. 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 3,961
  6. 2019CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers with Localizable Featurescited by 2,875
  7. 2020Unsupervised Learning of Visual Features by Contrasting Cluster Assignmentscited by 2,845
  8. 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,842
  9. 2019Invariant Risk Minimizationcited by 1,832
  10. 2019Do ImageNet Classifiers Generalize to ImageNet?cited by 1,507
  11. 2019Natural Adversarial Examplescited by 1,401
  12. 2022Model soups: averaging weights of multiple fine-tuned models improves accuracy without increasing inference timecited by 1,366
38 more
  1. 2016On Large-Batch Training for Deep Learning: Generalization Gap and Sharp Minimacited by 1,337
  2. 2018Moment Matching for Multi-Source Domain Adaptationcited by 1,327
  3. 2017Random Erasing Data Augmentationcited by 1,235
  4. 2019Distributionally Robust Neural Networks for Group Shifts: On the Importance of Regularization for Worst-Case Generalizationcited by 1,232
  5. 2016Deep CORAL: Correlation Alignment for Deep Domain Adaptationcited by 1,194
  6. 2018Averaging Weights Leads to Wider Optima and Better Generalizationcited by 1,194
  7. 2017Deep Hashing Network for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 1,181
  8. 2017Visualizing the Loss Landscape of Neural Netscited by 1,126
  9. 2020In Search of Lost Domain Generalizationcited by 1,042
  10. 2021VICReg: Variance-Invariance-Covariance Regularization for Self-Supervised Learningcited by 1,013
  11. 2019Learning Robust Global Representations by Penalizing Local Predictive Powercited by 1,010
  12. 2017Deeper, Broader and Artier Domain Generalizationcited by 983
  13. 2016Deep Networks with Stochastic Depthcited by 973
  14. 2021Robust fine-tuning of zero-shot modelscited by 785
  15. 2017Learning to Generalize: Meta-Learning for Domain Generalizationcited by 762
  16. 2020Out-of-Distribution Generalization via Risk Extrapolation (REx)cited by 737
  17. 2022Fine-Tuning can Distort Pretrained Features and Underperform Out-of-Distributioncited by 722
  18. 2018On Lazy Training in Differentiable Programmingcited by 671
  19. 2018Recognition in Terra Incognitacited by 655
  20. 2019Linear Mode Connectivity and the Lottery Ticket Hypothesiscited by 627
  21. 2021SWAD: Domain Generalization by Seeking Flat Minimacited by 431
  22. 2019Rapid Learning or Feature Reuse? Towards Understanding the Effectiveness of MAMLcited by 359
  23. 2014CNN Features off-the-shelf: an Astounding Baseline for Recognitioncited by 316
  24. 2020Gradient Starvation: A Learning Proclivity in Neural Networkscited by 262
  25. 2021TrivialAugment: Tuning-free Yet State-of-the-Art Data Augmentationcited by 225
  26. 2020Pitfalls of In-Domain Uncertainty Estimation and Ensembling in Deep Learningcited by 208
  27. 2022Diverse Weight Averaging for Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 148
  28. 2018Domain Generalization via Conditional Invariant Representationcited by 146
  29. 2021Ensemble of Averages: Improving Model Selection and Boosting Performance in Domain Generalizationcited by 144
  30. 2019Implicit regularization for deep neural networks driven by an Ornstein-Uhlenbeck like processcited by 123
  31. 2015Path-SGD: Path-Normalized Optimization in Deep Neural Networkscited by 117
  32. 2022Head2Toe: Utilizing Intermediate Representations for Better Transfer Learningcited by 83
  33. 2022SGD with Large Step Sizes Learns Sparse Featurescited by 66
  34. 2020Empirical or Invariant Risk Minimization? A Sample Complexity Perspectivecited by 62
  35. 2021No One Representation to Rule Them All: Overlapping Features of Training Methodscited by 57
  36. 2021Universal Representation Learning from Multiple Domains for Few-shot Classificationcited by 56
  37. 2017Universal representations:The missing link between faces, text, planktons, and cat breedscited by 45
  38. 2022Rich Feature Construction for the Optimization-Generalization Dilemmacited by 34

50 most cited of 56 All 56 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3.

3 papers.