Crafting Knowledge: Exploring the Creative Mechanisms of Chat-Based Search Engines
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In the domain of digital information dissemination, search engines act as pivotal conduits linking information seekers with providers. The advent of chat-based search engines utilizing Large Language Models (LLMs) and Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG), exemplified by Bing Chat, marks an evolutionary leap in the search ecosystem. They demonstrate metacognitive abilities in interpreting web information and crafting responses with human-like understanding and creativity. Nonetheless, the intricate nature of LLMs renders their "cognitive" processes opaque, challenging even their designers' understanding. This research aims to dissect the mechanisms through which an LLM-powered chat-based search engine, specifically Bing Chat, selects information sources for its responses. To this end, an extensive dataset has been compiled through engagements with New Bing, documenting the websites it cites alongside those listed by the conventional search engine. Employing natural language processing (NLP) techniques, the research reveals that Bing Chat exhibits a preference for content that is not only readable and formally structured, but also demonstrates lower perplexity levels, indicating a unique inclination towards text that is predictable by the underlying LLM. Further enriching our analysis, we procure an additional dataset through interactions with the GPT-4 based knowledge retrieval API, unveiling a congruent text preference between the RAG API and Bing Chat. This consensus suggests that these text preferences intrinsically emerge from the underlying language models, rather than being explicitly crafted by Bing Chat's developers. Moreover, our investigation documents a greater similarity among websites cited by RAG technologies compared to those ranked highest by conventional search engines.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Feb 2024.
Builds on
15 of 66 references.
References · 15
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
- 2021WebGPT: Browser-assisted question-answering with human feedbackcited by 1,722
- 2022Super-NaturalInstructions: Generalization via Declarative Instructions on 1600+ NLP Taskscited by 858
- 2022Red Teaming Language Models to Reduce Harms: Methods, Scaling Behaviors, and Lessons Learnedcited by 702
- 2018Explaining Explanations: An Overview of Interpretability of Machine Learningcited by 508
- 2023How Close is ChatGPT to Human Experts? Comparison Corpus, Evaluation, and Detectioncited by 472
- 2020Artificial Intelligence, Values and Alignmentcited by 443
- 2023Large Language Models for Information Retrieval: A Surveycited by 331
- 2023Benchmarking Large Language Models in Retrieval-Augmented Generationcited by 307
- 2023The Impact of AI on Developer Productivity: Evidence from GitHub Copilotcited by 264
- 2022Demystifying Prompts in Language Models via Perplexity Estimationcited by 215
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 1.
5 papers.
- 2024Model Internals-based Answer Attribution for Trustworthy Retrieval-Augmented Generationcited by 25
- 2024KVDirect: Distributed Disaggregated LLM Inferencecited by 8
- 2024Pointwise Mutual Information as a Performance Gauge for Retrieval-Augmented Generationcited by 6
- 2025Reinforcement Fine-Tuning for Reasoning towards Multi-Step Multi-Source Search in Large Language Modelscited by 3
- 2024Developer Perspectives on Licensing and Copyright Issues Arising from Generative AI for Software Developmentcited by 2
- 2025Reinforcement Fine-Tuning for Reasoning towards Multi-Step Multi-Source Search in Large Language Models10 Jun 2025
- 2024KVDirect: Distributed Disaggregated LLM Inference13 Dec 2024
- 2024Developer Perspectives on Licensing and Copyright Issues Arising from Generative AI for Software Development16 Nov 2024
- 2024Pointwise Mutual Information as a Performance Gauge for Retrieval-Augmented Generation12 Nov 2024
- 2024Model Internals-based Answer Attribution for Trustworthy Retrieval-Augmented Generation19 Jun 2024
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Characterizing Web Search by Conversational LLM Agents: From Search Decisions and Strategies to Results and Responses
- 2024Comparing the Utility, Preference, and Performance of Course Material Search Functionality and Retrieval-Augmented Generation Large Language Model (RAG-LLM) AI Chatbots in Information-Seeking Tasks
- 2026Beyond Pipelines: A Fundamental Study on the Rise of Generative-Retrieval Architectures in Web Research
- 2026From Tool to Teacher: Rethinking Search Systems as Instructive Interfaces
- 2025A Knowledge Graph and a Tripartite Evaluation Framework Make Retrieval-Augmented Generation Scalable and Transparent
- 2026Towards Semi-Automatically Comparing Keyword-Based and Semantic Search Accuracy ↗
- 2025Rethinking Search: A Study of University Students' Perspectives on Using LLMs and Traditional Search Engines in Academic Problem Solving
- 2024Deploying Large Language Models With Retrieval Augmented Generation